Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer in India

被引：8
作者：
Ansar P P [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ayyappan S [1 ]
Mahajan V. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Surgical Oncology, Apollo Specialty Hospitals, Teynampet, Chennai
[2] Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research Foundaton, Venjaramood, Trivandrum, 695607, Kerala
[3] Asaan Manzil, Pullampara P.O Venjaramoodu, Trivandrum, 695607, Kerala
来源：
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2018年 / 9卷 / 2期
关键词：
Endometrial cancer; Hystrectomy; India; Laparoscopy; Lymphadenectomy; Surgical staging;
D O I：
10.1007/s13193-017-0633-6
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Laparoscopic procedures to treat endometrial cancer are currently emerging. At present, we have evidence to do laparoscopic oncologic resections for endometrial cancer as proven by many prospective studies from abroad such as LAP2 by GOG. So, we have decided to assess the safety and feasibility of such a study in our population with the following as our primary objectives: (1) to study whether laparoscopy is better compared to open approach in terms of duration of hospital stay, perioperative morbidity and early recovery from surgical trauma and (2) to study whether the laparoscopic approach is noninferior to the open approach in terms of number of lymph nodes harvested in lymphadenectomy and rate of conversion to open surgery. We did a prospective nonrandomized comparative study of open versus laparoscopy approach for surgical staging of endometrial cancer from 16th May 2013 to 15th May 2015. To prove a significant difference in the hospital stay, we needed 29 patients in each arm. Thirty patients in each arm were enrolled for the study. The median duration of stay in the open arm was 7 days and in the laparoscopy arm it was 5 days. The advantage of 2 days in the laparoscopic arm was statistically significant (P value 0.006). Forty percent of patients in the open arm had to stay in the hospital for more than 7 days whereas only 3% of patients in the laparoscopy arm required to stay for more than 7 days (P value 0.001). This difference was statistically significant. There was no significant difference between the early complication rates between the two arms (20% in open vs. 13% in laparoscopy; P value 0.730). There was a conversion rate of 10% in laparoscopy. The median number of nodes harvested in open arm was 16.50 and in the laparoscopy arm, it was 13.50. The difference was not statistically significant (P value 0.086). Laparoscopy approach for endometrial cancer staging is feasible in Indian patients and the short-term advantages are replicable with same oncologic safety as proved by randomized controlled trials. © 2017, Indian Association of Surgical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码：133 / 140
页数：7
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Ervik M., Dikshit R., Eser S., Mathers C., Rebelo M., Parkin D.M., Forman D., Bray F., GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet], Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, (2013)
  • [2] Balasubramaniam G., Sushama S., Rasika B., Mahantshetty U., Hospital-based study of endometrial cancer survival in Mumbai, India, Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 14, 2, pp. 977-980, (2013)
  • [3] National cancer registry programme ICMR: 3 year report of population based cancer registries 2009–2011, Population Based Cancer Registry Chennai, (2015)
  • [4] Creasman W.T., Morrow C.P., Bundy B.M., Homesley H.D., Graham J.E., Heller T.B., Surgical pathological study of endometrial cancer: a gynecology oncology group, Cancer, 60, pp. 2035-2041, (1987)
  • [5] Creutzberg C.L., Van Putten W.L.J., Koper P.C., Lybeert M.L.M., Jobsen J.J., Warlam-Rodenhuis C.C., De Winter K.A.J., Lutgens L.C.H.W., Van den Bergh A.C.M., Van der Steen-Banasik E., Beerman H., Van Lent M., Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial, Gynecol Oncol, 89, pp. 201-209, (2003)
  • [6] Mariani A., Webb M.J., Keeney G.L., Lesnick T.G., Podratz K.C., Surgical stage I endometrial cancer: predictors of distant failure and death, Gynecol Oncol, 87, pp. 274-280, (2002)
  • [7] Childers J.M., Brzechffa P., Hatch K.D., Surwit E.A., Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging (LASS) of endometrial cancer, Gynecol Oncol, 47, pp. 669-685, (1993)
  • [8] Walker J.L., Piedmonte M.R., Spirtos N.M., Eisenkop S.M., Schlaerth J.B., Mannel R.S., Spiegel G., Barakat R., Pearl M.L., Sharma S.K., Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynecologic oncology group study LAP2, J Clin Oncol, 27, pp. 5331-5336, (2009)
  • [9] Obermair A., Janda M., Baker J., Et al., Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised-controlled clinical trial, Eur J Cancer, 48, 8, pp. 1147-1153, (2012)
  • [10] Zullo F., Falbo A., Palomba S., Safety of laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 207, 2, pp. 94-100, (2012)
12