Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do?

被引:0
作者
Aamir Raoof Memon
机构
[1] Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women,Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
来源
Science and Engineering Ethics | 2018年 / 24卷
关键词
Editorial policy; Impact factor; Peer review; Predatory journals; Research fraud;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the internet era spam has become a big problem. Researchers are troubled with unsolicited or bulk spam emails inviting them to publish. However, this strategy has helped predatory journals hunt their prey and earn money. These journals have grown tremendously during the past few years despite serious efforts by researchers and scholarly organizations to hinder their growth. Predatory journals and publishers are often based in developing countries, and they potentially target researchers from these counties by using different tactics identified in previous research. In response to the spread of predatory publishing, scientists are trying to develop criteria and guidelines to help avoid them—for example, the recently reported “predatory rate”. This article attempts to (a) highlight the strategies used by predatory journals to convince researchers to publish with them, (b) report their article processing charges, (c) note their presence in Jeffrey Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers, (d) rank them based on the predatory rate, and (e) put forward suggestions for junior researchers (especially in developing counties), who are the most likely targets of predatory journals.
引用
收藏
页码:1617 / 1639
页数:22
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Beall J(2013)Medical publishing triage: Chronicling predatory open access publishers Annals of Medicine and Surgery 2 47-49
  • [2] Beall J(2017)What I learned from predatory publishers Biochemia Medica 27 273-279
  • [3] Bloudoff-Indelicato M(2015)Backlash after Frontiers journals added to list of questionable publishers Nature 526 613-65
  • [4] Bohannon J(2013)Who’s afraid of peer review? Science 342 60-2408
  • [5] Casadevall A(2016)ASM journals eliminate impact factor information from journal websites Infection and Immunity 84 2407-4
  • [6] Bertuzzi S(2015)Firm action needed on predatory journals BMJ 350 h210-4
  • [7] Buchmeier MJ(2016)Five (bad) reasons to publish your research in predatory journals Journal of Advanced Nursing 6 1-43
  • [8] Davis RJ(2016)Ranking predatory journals: Solve the problem instead of removing it! Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin 11 1-362
  • [9] Drake H(2016)Unworthy peer review process and publishing method Italian Journal of Medicine 19 42-800
  • [10] Fang FC(2015)Special issues as criterion for journal quality evaluation: Letter to Editor Geographica Pannonica 12 353-1072