The Evolution of Man and Machine—a Review of Current Surgical Techniques and Cutting Technologies After Upper Extremity Amputation

被引：1

作者：

Chi A. ^{[1
,2
]}

Smith S. ^{[1
]}

Womack I. ^{[1
]}

Armiger R. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Division of Trauma, Critical Care & Acute Care Surgery Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, 97239, OR

[2] Research and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins Applied Physical Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, 20723, MD

来源：

Current Trauma Reports | 2018年 / 4卷 / 4期

关键词：

Implantable Myoelectric Sensor; LUKE Arm; Modular Prosthetic Limb; Osseointegration; SensorCuff; Targeted Muscle Reinnervation;

D O I：

10.1007/s40719-018-0142-2

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Purpose of review: This review focuses on the cutting edge of surgery and technologies following upper extremity loss. A range of technologies will be reviewed with the common theme of bionics. Recent findings: Traditional surgical amputation techniques are antiquated, especially with commercially advanced prosthetic technologies available following Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) surgery for the upper extremity. TMR should be standard of care not only for its benefits for advanced prosthetic control but also for its improvement in neuroma pain and prevention of neuroma formation. Current investigations of different technologies hold a bionic solution to arm restoration. Summary: Many technologies currently exist in different phases of clinical research while others are immediately available and should be standard of care following upper extremity amputation. It is important that the healthcare community has understanding of the developing and available technology in the area of bionics and its application to upper extremity prosthetics. © 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

引用

页码：339 / 347

页数：8

共 37 条

[1]

Reznick J.S., Koyle K.M., Combat and the medical mindset--the enduring effect of civil war medical innovation, N Engl J Med, 372, 25, pp. 2377-2380, (2015)

[2]

Owens B.D., Kragh J.F., Macaitis J., Svoboda S.J., Wenke J.C., Characterization of extremity wounds in operation Iraqi freedom and operation enduring freedom, J Orthop Trauma, 21, 4, pp. 254-257, (2007)

[3]

Stinner D.J., Burns T.C., Kirk K.L., Ficke J.R., Return to duty rate in current conflicts in Afghanistan and Irag, J Trauma, 68, 6, pp. 1476-1479, (2010)

[4]

Tennent D.J., Wenke J.C., Rivera J.C., Krueger C.A., Characterisation and outcomes of upper extremity amputations, Injury, 45, 6, pp. 965-969, (2014)

[5]

Resnik L., Et al., Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 93, 4, pp. 710-717, (2012)

[6]

McFarland L.V., Winkler S.L.H., Heinemann A.W., Jones M., Esquenazi A., Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts, J Rehabil Res Dev, 47, 4, pp. 299-316, (2010)

[7]

Resnik L., Et al., Function, quality of life, and community integration of DEKA Arm users after discharge from prosthetic training: Impact of home use experience, Prosthetics Orthot Int, (2018)

[8]

Kuiken T.A., Et al., The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee, Prosthetics Orthot Int, 28, 3, pp. 245-253, (2004)

[9]

Kuiken T.A., Et al., Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms, JAMA, 301, 6, pp. 619-628, (2009)

[10]

Hijjawi J.B., Kuiken T.A., Lipschutz R.D., Miller L.A., Stubblefield K.A., Dumanian G.A., Improved myoelectric prosthesis control accomplished using multiple nerve transfers, Plast Reconstr Surg, 118, 7, pp. 1573-1578, (2006)

← 1 2 3 4 →