Verification of Coupled Hydraulic Fracturing Simulators Using Laboratory-Scale Experiments

被引:0
|
作者
Paromita Deb
Saeed Salimzadeh
Daniel Vogler
Stephan Düber
Christoph Clauser
Randolph R. Settgast
机构
[1] RWTH Aachen University,Institute for Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy
[2] Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization,ETH Zurich , Geothermal Energy and Geofluids
[3] CSIRO,Chair of Geotechnical Engineering
[4] Institute of Geophysics,Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
[5] RWTH Aachen University,undefined
[6] Atmospheric,undefined
[7] Earth and Energy Division,undefined
来源
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering | 2021年 / 54卷
关键词
Laboratory-experiments; Hydraulic fracturing; Simulation; Leak-off; Fracture toughness; System compressibility; Fracture radius; Acoustic emission;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this work, we aim to verify the predictions of the numerical simulators, which are used for designing field-scale hydraulic stimulation experiments. Although a strong theoretical understanding of this process has been gained over the past few decades, numerical predictions of fracture propagation in low-permeability rocks still remains a challenge. Against this background, we performed controlled laboratory-scale hydraulic fracturing experiments in granite samples, which not only provides high-quality experimental data but also a well-characterized experimental set-up. Using the experimental pressure responses and the final fracture sizes as benchmark, we compared the numerical predictions of two coupled hydraulic fracturing simulators—CSMP and GEOS. Both the simulators reproduced the experimental pressure behavior by implementing the physics of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) and lubrication theory within a reasonable degree of accuracy. The simulation results indicate that even in the very low-porosity (1–2 %) and low-permeability (10-18m2-10-19m2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${10}^{-18}\ {\mathrm{m}}^{2}- {10}^{-19}\ {\mathrm{m}}^{2}$$\end{document}) crystalline rocks, which are usually the target of EGS, fluid-loss into the matrix and unsaturated flow impacts the formation breakdown pressure and the post-breakdown pressure trends. Therefore, underestimation of such parameters in numerical modeling can lead to significant underestimation of breakdown pressure. The simulation results also indicate the importance of implementing wellbore solvers for considering the effect of system compressibility and pressure drop due to friction in the injection line. The varying injection rate as a result of decompression at the instant of fracture initiation affects the fracture size, while the entry friction at the connection between the well and the initial notch may cause an increase in the measured breakdown pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:2881 / 2902
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Two-dimensional stable-layered laboratory-scale experiments for testing density-coupled flow models
    Konz, M.
    Ackerer, P.
    Younes, A.
    Huggenberger, P.
    Zechner, E.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
  • [22] Laboratory investigation of hydraulic fracturing in granitic rocks using active and passive seismic monitoring
    Butt, A.
    Hedayat, A.
    Moradian, O.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 234 (03) : 1752 - 1770
  • [23] Mineralogical alterations during laboratory-scale carbon sequestration experiments for the Illinois Basin
    Yoksoulian, L. E.
    Freiburg, J. T.
    Butler, S. K.
    Berger, P. M.
    Roy, W. R.
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 5601 - 5611
  • [24] Hydro-mechanical coupled modeling of hydraulic fracturing using the mesh fragmentation technique
    Cleto, Pedro R.
    Manzoli, Osvaldo L.
    Sanchez, Marcelo
    Maedo, Michael A.
    Beserra, Leila B. S.
    Guimaraes, Leonardo J. N.
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2020, 124
  • [25] Laboratory-scale hydraulic pulse testing: influence of air fraction in cavity on estimation of permeability
    Selvadurai, A. P. S.
    Najari, M.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2015, 65 (02): : 126 - 134
  • [26] Microseismic Monitoring of Laboratory Hydraulic Fracturing Experiments in Granitic Rocks for Different Fracture Propagation Regimes
    A. Butt
    A. Hedayat
    O. Moradian
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2024, 57 : 2035 - 2059
  • [27] Microseismic Monitoring of Laboratory Hydraulic Fracturing Experiments in Granitic Rocks for Different Fracture Propagation Regimes
    Butt, A.
    Hedayat, A.
    Moradian, O.
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2024, 57 (03) : 2035 - 2059
  • [28] Laboratory Hydraulic Fracturing of Large-Scale Granite Characterized by Acoustic Emission Under Different Confining Conditions
    Wang, Huang
    Wang, Guiling
    Chen, Yuedu
    Liu, Lu
    Zhao, Zhihong
    Gan, Haonan
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [29] Smeared modeling of hydraulic fracture using partially coupled reservoir and geomechanics simulators
    Roostaei, Morteza
    Taghipoor, Siavash
    Nouri, Alireza
    Fattahpour, Vahidoddin
    Chan, Dave
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2019, 113 : 99 - 111
  • [30] Characteristics of carbon dioxide fracturing in comparison to conventional water hydraulic fracturing: Evidence from acoustic emission monitoring of small-scale field experiments
    Ishida, Tsuyoshi
    Kishimoto, Yoshinobu
    Desaki, Shuich
    Naoi, Makoto
    Suzuki, Kenichiro
    Fujii, Hirokazu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2023, 172