A critical review of empirical research on open innovation adoption

被引：2
作者：
Alexander Schroll
Andreas Mild
机构：
[1] WU Vienna,Institute for Production Management
来源：
Journal für Betriebswirtschaft | 2012年 / 62卷 / 2期
关键词：
Open innovation; State-of-the-art; Literature review; Adoption; Drivers; Characteristics; Empirical research; D22; M1; O32; Open Innovation; Review; Adoption; Einflussfaktoren; Charakteristika; Empirische Forschung;
D O I：
10.1007/s11301-012-0084-7
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The open innovation approach has been one of the most discussed topics in innovation management literature in the 2000s. Over the past few years, academic publications on open innovation have increased substantially. This paper attempts to summarize and review the state-of-the-art of empirical open innovation research and develop new opportunities for open innovation research in the future. In order to make the papers more comparable, a clear focus on large-scale quantitative-oriented studies was set. From a total of 282 documents, 30 studies were analyzed in detail along four key dimensions: Firstly, different methods of measuring open innovation adoption are compared. Then, the level of open innovation adoption is analyzed on a general basis. Thirdly, the level of adoption is compared at the level of the open innovation mode (inbound and outbound). Finally, the study results regarding the variables that influence open innovation adoption are compared and conclusions for future research directions are drawn.
引用
收藏
页码：85 / 118
页数：33
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] Barge-Gil A(2010)Open, semi-open and closed innovators: towards an explanation of degree of openness Ind Innov 17 577-607
  • [2] Belussi F(2010)Learning at the boundaries in an “Open regional innovation system”: a focus on firms’ innovation strategies in the emilia romagna life science industry Res Policy 39 710-721
  • [3] Sammarra A(2011)Selling technological knowledge: managing the complexities of technology transactions Res Technol Manag 54 18-26
  • [4] Sedita SR(2008)Organising new business development: open innovation at Degussa Eur J Innov Manag 11 330-348
  • [5] Bianchi M(2011)The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms Technovation 31 362-373
  • [6] Chiesa V(2007)Why companies should have open business models MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48 22-28
  • [7] Frattini F(2007)Open innovation and strategy Calif Manag Rev 50 57-76
  • [8] Bröring S(2006)Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries R&D Manag 36 229-236
  • [9] Herzog P(2010)Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge flows R&D Manag 40 292-299
  • [10] Chen J(2009)Investigating the adoption of open innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: a framework and an empirical analysis Eur J Innov Manag 12 285-305
12345678910