Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis for molecular subtypes in low-grade breast carcinoma: comparison with grade one invasive ductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified

被引:0
作者
Shuling Wang
Weidong Li
Ning Liu
Tongxian Zhang
Han Liu
Junjun Liu
Fen Liu
Wei Zhang
Estifanos P. Gebreamlak
Yun Niu
机构
[1] Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital,Department of Breast Cancer Pathology and Research Laboratory
[2] Tianjin Medical University,Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy
[3] Ministry of Education,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy
[4] Baodi Hospital,Department of Pathology
来源
Medical Oncology | 2012年 / 29卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Molecular subtypes; Low-grade breast carcinomas; Grade one invasive ductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis value for molecular subtypes of low-grade breast carcinoma (LGBC) compared with grade one invasive ductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified (G1-IDC-NOS). A retrospective review of 688 LGBC and 1 037 G1-IDC-NOS patients was classified into four different molecular subtypes based on the IHC-based definitions for ER, PR, and c-erbB-2. In LGBC, lymph node metastasis, the percentage of III/IV TNM stages, the expression of Ki-67 and p53 in luminal A subtype were lower than in other subtypes (P < 0.01). In addition, the variations of Ki-67 and p53 expression were observed in different subtypes of G1-IDC-NOS (P < 0.01). Compared with G1-IDC-NOS, LGBC has higher proportion in the ER positive, PR positive, HER-2 negative, luminal A subtype, Ki-67 negative, and lymph nodes negative group (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the overall survival of luminal A and luminal B is higher than triple-negative and HER-2/neu subtype both in LGBC and G1-IDC-NOS in 262 LGBC and 330 G1-IDC-NOS patients with proper follow-up. The classification of molecular subtype together with clinicopathologic factors can significantly improve the traditional prognosticators in predicting outcome for LGBC and G1-IDC-NOS. And it may contribute to guide the treatment for LGBC and G1-IDC-NOS in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:2556 / 2564
页数:8
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Greenlee RT(2000)Cancer statistics, 2000 CA Cancer J Clin 50 7-33
[2]  
Murray T(2000)Molecular portraits of human breast tumours Nature 406 747-752
[3]  
Bolden S(2005)Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy Clin Cancer Res 11 5678-5685
[4]  
Wingo PA(2006)Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study JAMA 295 2492-2502
[5]  
Perou CM(2009)Breast cancer precursors: lessons learned from molecular genetics J Mol Med (Berl) 87 113-115
[6]  
Sorlie T(2007)High frequency of coexistence of columnar cell lesions, lobular neoplasia, and low grade ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive tubular carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma Am J Surg Pathol 31 417-426
[7]  
Eisen MB(2008)Morphologic and molecular evolutionary pathways of low nuclear grade invasive breast cancers and their putative precursor lesions: further evidence to support the concept of low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family Am J Surg Pathol 32 513-523
[8]  
Rouzier R(2000)Historical and epidemiologic background of human premalignant breast disease J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 5 341-349
[9]  
Perou CM(2006)Clinicopathologic significance of the basal-like subtype of breast cancer: a comparison with hormone receptor and Her2/neu-overexpressing phenotypes Hum Pathol 37 1217-1226
[10]  
Symmans WF(2006)Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer J Clin Oncol 24 5652-5657