Pupillary correlates of individual differences in n-back task performance

被引:0
作者
Matthew K. Robison
Lauren D. Garner
机构
[1] The University of Texas at Arlington,Department of Psychology
来源
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics | 2024年 / 86卷
关键词
Working memory; Attention; Pupillometry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We used pupillometry during a 2-back task to examine individual differences in the intensity and consistency of attention and their relative role in a working memory task. We used sensitivity, or the ability to distinguish targets (2-back matches) and nontargets, as the measure of task performance; task-evoked pupillary responses (TEPRs) as the measure of attentional intensity; and intraindividual pretrial pupil variability as the measure of attentional consistency. TEPRs were greater on target trials compared with nontarget trials, although there was no difference in TEPR magnitude when participants answered correctly or incorrectly to targets. Importantly, this effect interacted with performance: high performers showed a greater separation in their TEPRs between targets and nontargets, whereas there was little difference for low performers. Further, in regression analysis, larger TEPRs on target trials predicted better performance, whereas larger TEPRs on nontarget trials predicted worse performance. Sensitivity positively correlated with average pretrial pupil diameter and negatively correlated with intraindividual variability in pretrial pupil diameter. Overall, we found evidence that both attentional intensity (TEPRs) and consistency (pretrial pupil variation) predict performance on an n-back working memory task.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 807
页数:8
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] Ackerman PL(2005)Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin 131 30-60
  • [2] Beier ME(2020)The effects of cognitive abilities and task demands on tonic and phasic pupil sizes Biological Psychology 156 Article 107945-89
  • [3] Boyle MO(1974)Working memory Psychology of Learning and Motivation 8 47-26
  • [4] Aminihajibashi S(1999)Physiological characteristics of capacity constraints in working memory as revealed by functional MRI Cerebral Cortex 9 20-114
  • [5] Hagen T(2001)The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 87-921
  • [6] Andreassen OA(2014)PyGaze: An open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments Behavior Research Methods 46 913-156
  • [7] Laeng B(2015)Individual differences in working memory capacity are reflected in different ERP and EEG patterns to task difficulty Brain Research 1616 146-331
  • [8] Espeseth T(2019)Neural correlates of verbal working memory: An fMRI meta-analysis Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13 180-680
  • [9] Baddeley AD(1999)Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 309-1186
  • [10] Hitch G(2021)Pupillometry tracks cognitive load and salience network activity in a working memory functional magnetic resonance imaging task Human Brain Mapping 43 665-1192