Forecasting Groundwater Levels using a Hybrid of Support Vector Regression and Particle Swarm Optimization

被引:0
作者
Saeed Mozaffari
Saman Javadi
Hamid Kardan Moghaddam
Timothy O. Randhir
机构
[1] University of Tehran,Department of Water Engineering, College of Aburaihan
[2] Water Research Institute,Department of Water Resources Study and Research
[3] University of Massachusetts,Department of Environmental Conservation, College of Natural Sciences
来源
Water Resources Management | 2022年 / 36卷
关键词
Bayesian networks; Groundwater level forecasting; Particle swarm optimization; Supportive vector regression; SVR-PSO hybrid model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forecasting the groundwater level is crucial to managing water resources supply sustainably. In this study, a simulation–optimization hybrid model was developed to forecast groundwater levels in aquifers. The model uses the PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization) algorithm to optimize SVR (Support Vector Regression) parameters to predict groundwater levels. The groundwater level of the Zanjan aquifer in Iran was forecasted and compared to the results of Bayesian and SVR models. In the first approach, the aquifers hydrograph was extracted using the Thiessen method, and then the time series of the hydrograph was used in training and testing the model. In the second approach, the time series data from each well was trained and tested separately. In other words, for 35 observation wells, 35 predictions were made. Aquifer’s hydrograph was evaluated using the forecasted groundwater level in the wells. The results showed that the SVR-PSO hybrid model performed better than other models in terms of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}^{2}$$\end{document}) in both approaches. In the first approach, the SVR-PSO hybrid model forecasted the groundwater level in the next month with a training RMSE of 0.118 m and testing RMSE of 0.221 m. In the second approach, using the SVR-PSO hybrid model, the RMSE error was reduced in 88.57% of the wells compared to other models, and more reliable results were achieved. Based on the performance, the SVR-PSO hybrid model can be used as a tool for decision support and management of similar aquifers.
引用
收藏
页码:1955 / 1972
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Aguilera P(2011)Bayesian networks in environmental modelling Environ Model Softw 26 1376-1388
  • [2] Fernández A(2009)Bayesian method for groundwater quality monitoring network analysis J Water Resour Plan Manag 137 51-61
  • [3] Fernández R(2009)Comparative study of SVMs and ANNs in aquifer water level prediction J Comput Civ Eng 24 408-413
  • [4] Rumí R(2012)Structural reliability assessment by local approximation of limit state functions using adaptive Markov chain simulation and support vector regression Comput Aided Civ Inf Eng 27 676-686
  • [5] Salmerón A(2014)Support vector machine and regression analysis to predict the field hydraulic conductivity of sandy soil Support Vector Machine Applications in the Field of Hydrology: a Review Applied Soft Computing 19 372-386
  • [6] Ammar K(2015)An evolutionary Bayesian belief network methodology for optimum management of groundwater contamination KSCE J Civ Eng 19 2307-2316
  • [7] McKee M(2009)Evaluation of Seasonally Classified Inputs for the Prediction of Daily Groundwater Levels: NARX Networks Vs Support Vector Machines Environ Model Softw 24 303-310
  • [8] Kaluarachchi J(2019)Bayesian framework for water quality model uncertainty estimation and risk management Environ Model Assess 24 223-234
  • [9] Behzad M(2013)Monthly groundwater level prediction using ANN and neuro-fuzzy models: a case study on Kerman plain J Hydrol Eng 19 04014015-876
  • [10] Asghari K(2010)A novel nonlinear regression model of SVR as a substitute for ANN to predict conductivity of MWCNT-CuO/water hybrid nanofluid based on empirical data Iran J Hydroinformatics 13 867-97