On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data

被引:0
|
作者
Udo Boehm
Maarten Marsman
Dora Matzke
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
机构
[1] University of Groningen,Department of Experimental Psychology
[2] University of Amsterdam,Department of Psychology
来源
Behavior Research Methods | 2018年 / 50卷
关键词
Cognitive models; Statistical test; Statistical errors; Bayes factor; Hierarchical Bayesian model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Psychological experiments often yield data that are hierarchically structured. A number of popular shortcut strategies in cognitive modeling do not properly accommodate this structure and can result in biased conclusions. To gauge the severity of these biases, we conducted a simulation study for a two-group experiment. We first considered a modeling strategy that ignores the hierarchical data structure. In line with theoretical results, our simulations showed that Bayesian and frequentist methods that rely on this strategy are biased towards the null hypothesis. Secondly, we considered a modeling strategy that takes a two-step approach by first obtaining participant-level estimates from a hierarchical cognitive model and subsequently using these estimates in a follow-up statistical test. Methods that rely on this strategy are biased towards the alternative hypothesis. Only hierarchical models of the multilevel data lead to correct conclusions. Our results are particularly relevant for the use of hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimates in cognitive modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:1614 / 1631
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data
    Boehm, Udo
    Marsman, Maarten
    Matzke, Dora
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (04) : 1614 - 1631
  • [2] Hierarchical Bayesian cognitive processing models to analyze clinical trial data
    Shankle, William R.
    Hara, Junko
    Mangrola, Tushar
    Hendrix, Suzanne
    Alva, Gus
    Lee, Michael D.
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2013, 9 (04) : 422 - 428
  • [3] Applying Fixed Effects to Hierarchical Segregation Models
    Shatnawi, Dina
    Oaxaca, Ronald
    Ransom, Michael
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (03): : 588 - 592
  • [4] Applying the hierarchical linear model to longitudinal data
    Walters, Ryan W.
    Hoffman, Lesa
    CULTURA Y EDUCACION, 2017, 29 (03): : 666 - 701
  • [5] Hierarchical Bayesian models of cognitive development
    Thomas Glassen
    Verena Nitsch
    Biological Cybernetics, 2016, 110 : 217 - 227
  • [6] Hierarchical Bayesian models of cognitive development
    Glassen, Thomas
    Nitsch, Verena
    BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 2016, 110 (2-3) : 217 - 227
  • [7] Applying data models to big data architectures
    O'Sullivan, P.
    Thompson, G.
    Clifford, A.
    IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 58 (5-6) : 5 - 6
  • [8] Hierarchical models for data visualization
    Tipping, ME
    Bishop, CM
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS, 1997, (440): : 70 - 75
  • [9] Applying Complex Models on Genomic Data
    Durand, Patrick
    Lavenier, Dominique
    Leborgne, Michel
    Siegel, Anne
    Veber, Philippe
    Nicolas, Jacques
    ERCIM NEWS, 2005, (60): : 47 - 48
  • [10] Avoiding Pitfalls in Applying Prediction Models, As Illustrated by the Example of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
    Cammann, Henning
    Jung, Klaus
    Meyer, Hellmuth-A.
    Stephan, Carsten
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 57 (11) : 1490 - 1498