The importance and value of EQA for diagnostic genetic laboratories

被引:18
作者
Hastings R.J. [1 ]
Howell R.T. [2 ]
机构
[1] CEQA, Cytogenetics European Quality Assessment, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust
[2] UK NEQAS for Clinical Cytogenetics, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust
关键词
External Quality Assessment; Diagnostic Service; External Quality Assessment Scheme; Human Genome Variation Society; External Quality Assessment Programme;
D O I
10.1007/s12687-010-0009-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Quality control in a laboratory setting requires the establishment of effective training, standard opera ting procedures, internal quality control, validation of tests and external quality assessment (EQA). A structured quality management system subject to regular internal and external audits will minimise the error rate. EQA, therefore, gives assurance, both to patients and referring clinicians, that the diagnostic laboratory is competent to produce results that are reliable and accurate. EQA is educational and aims to improve and validate the overall quality of genetic service to the user. Regular EQA assessment compares laboratory performance against set standards and also allows comparison between laboratories. Sometimes EQA can also help to define good standards (best practice), although this does depend on the type of EQA test. EQA interprets best practice standards (=quality) into a numerical score (=quantity). While international bodies or professional organisations set these standards, EQA is able to assess whether these standards are met, with any omissions resulting in a reduction in the total score. Although EQA has an educational role rather than a punitive role, critical errors affecting clinical management will result in a laboratory receiving a poor performance categorisation. Accurate analysis and interpretation are essential quality parameters that require extensive knowledge of the aetiology of genetic abnormalities/ disease and risk factors. Training of staff in interpretation of the results together with a comprehensive means of reporting normal and abnormal genetic results underpins the diagnostic service to the patient. Poor-performing laboratories are, therefore, encouraged to review their internal processes. EQA schemes that have been established for many years have seen improvements in the analytical and reporting content over time, thereby improving the quality of diagnostic service available to patients. © Springer-Verlag 2010.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 17
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ACMG Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories, (1999)
[2]  
Professional Guidelines for Clinical Cytogenetics, (2007)
[3]  
Dequeker E., Ramsden S., Grody W.W., Stenzel T.T., Barton D.E., Quality control in molecular genetic testing, Nature Reviews Genetics, 2, 9, pp. 717-723, (2001)
[4]  
Elles R., Kamarainen O., External quality assessment in molecular genetics, Quality Issues in Clinical Genetic Services, (2009)
[5]  
Fowler B., Burlina A., Kozich V., Vianey-Saban C., Quality of analytical performance in inherited metabolic disorders: The role of ERNDIM, J Inherit Metab Dis, 31, pp. 680-689, (2008)
[6]  
Hastings R.J., Quality control, FISH: Methods and Applications, (2009)
[7]  
Hastings R.J., Howell R., Quality in cytogenetics, Quality Issues in Clinical Genetic Services, (2009)
[8]  
Hastings R.J., Cavani S., Bricarelli F.D., Et al., Cytogenetic guidelines and quality assurance: A common European framework for quality assessment for constitutional and acquired cytogenetic investigations, ECA Newsletter, 17, pp. 13-32, (2006)
[9]  
Hastings R.J., Cavani S., Bricarelli F.D., Patsalis P.C., Kristoffersson U., Cytogenetic Guidelines and Quality Assurance: A common European framework for quality assessment for constitutional and acquired cytogenetic investigations, European Journal of Human Genetics, 15, 5, pp. 525-527, (2007)
[10]  
Hastings R.J., Maher E.J., Quellhorst-Pawley B., Howell R.T., An internet-based external quality assessment (EQA) in cytogenetics that audits a laboratory's analytical and interpretative performance, Eur J Hum Genet, 16, pp. 1217-1224, (2008)