Completion delay risk management: A dynamic risk insurance approach

被引:0
作者
Nakhon Kokkaew
Warit Wipulanusat
机构
[1] Walailak University,Dept. of Civil Engineering
来源
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering | 2014年 / 18卷
关键词
uncertainty; completion risk insurance; envelope method; monte carlo simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the construction of an infrastructure project, completion delay is one of the major risks to the financial outlook of an infrastructure project under construction. During the construction phase, if the project is delayed, project managers can take specific actions to shorten the duration of certain activities on the critical path in order to restore the project to its original schedule. However, not all management actions to shorten the duration of activities are cost-effective: the cost of reducing some activities’ duration may exceed the savings. Risk that project managers cannot economically reduce through management feedback reactions should instead be transferred to third parties such as insurance companies that have risk pooling capacity. In this paper, we present a novel way of managing completion delay risk through “dynamic risk insurance” by combining a technique known as the envelope method with a stochastic-based Monte Carlo method. Two important features of this implementation of dynamic completion risk insurance are (1) a stochastic risk premium between the contractor and the surety over the course of construction and (2) evolution of the risk premium as a function of management feedback reaction. Finally, two illustrative examples, a BOT road and a commercial building, demonstrate how the proposed model may be applied in practice. The new model of dynamic risk insurance presented in this paper may improve risk management practice in large-scale construction projects that are loaded with uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:1599 / 1608
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Al-Bahar J.(1990)Systematic risk management approach for construction projects J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 116 533-546
[2]  
Crandall K.(2012)Riskneutral pricing approach for evaluating BOT highway projects with government minimum revenue guarantee options Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 138 545-557
[3]  
Ashuri B.(2005)Theft and vandalism on construction sites J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 826-833
[4]  
Kashani H.(1999)Pitfalls in builder’s risk insurance for temporary structures in construction Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 4 153-155
[5]  
Molenaar K.(2008)The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects Construction Management and Economics 26 1171-1180
[6]  
Lee S.(2013)Alternative to government revenue guarantees: The dynamic revenue insurance contracts J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 287-296
[7]  
Lu J.(2006)From noble prize to project management: Getting risks right Project Management Journal 37 5-15
[8]  
Berg R.(2000)Construction risk analysis tool for determining liquidated damages risk premiums: Case study J. Constr. Eng. Manage., ASCE 126 407-413
[9]  
Hinze J.(2005)Project scheduling-theory and practice Production and Operations Management 14 413-432
[10]  
Borg R.(2012)Schedule uncertainty control: A literature review Physics Procedia 33 1842-1848