Promoting interdisciplinary understanding in asynchronous online higher education courses: a learning communities approach

被引:0
作者
Adi Kidron
Yael Kali
机构
[1] University of Haifa,
[2] LINKS I-CORE,undefined
来源
Instructional Science | 2024年 / 52卷
关键词
Asynchronous online courses; Interdisciplinary understanding; Knowledge integration; Learning communities; Synthesis; Undergraduate education;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this research is to examine whether, and how, an asynchronous online learning community pedagogical approach can address students’ challenge of integrating disciplinary ideas into an interdisciplinary understanding. A quasi-experimental research design was conducted in which 51 undergraduate students were allocated into two groups who learned a similar asynchronous online interdisciplinary course. The two groups differed in the learning mode in which the courses were designed and taught: a learning community (LC) mode for the experimental group, versus an individual learning (IL) mode for the control group. We used a designated rubric to compare the quality of students’ interdisciplinary understanding, as expressed in a synthesis essay each student wrote. Findings show that students’ abilities to synthesize disciplinary ideas were significantly higher in the LC group. Since synthesis of disciplinary ideas is the goal and essence of interdisciplinarity, we view these findings as indicating a higher quality of interdisciplinary understanding among the LC mode students. This work demonstrates and delineates the potential of the LC approach to promote the development of interdisciplinary understanding in higher-education asynchronous online environments.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 169
页数:30
相关论文
共 138 条
[1]  
Barzilai S(2012)Epistemic thinking in action: Evaluating and integrating online sources Cognition and Instruction 30 39-85
[2]  
Zohar A(2018)Promoting integration of multiple texts: A review of instructional approaches and practices Educational Psychology review 30 973-999
[3]  
Barzilai S(2013)Increasing social engagement in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder using collaborative technologies in the school environment Autism 17 317-339
[4]  
Zohar AR(2017)Collaborative learning: A learning tool advantages and disadvantages Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing 8 850-852
[5]  
Mor-Hagani S(2007)Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed The Journal of Higher Education 78 215-237
[6]  
Bauminger-Zviely N(2009)Targeted assessment rubric: An empirically grounded rubric for interdisciplinary writing The Journal of Higher Education 80 334-353
[7]  
Eden S(1999)Barriers to interdisciplinarity: Disciplinary discourses and student learning Journal of Geography in Higher Education 23 381-396
[8]  
Zancanaro M(2009)Expanding the social frame of knowledge: Interdisciplinary, degree-granting fields in american colleges and universities, 1975–2000 The Review of Higher Education 32 155-183
[9]  
Weiss PL(2016)Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success Nature 534 684-687
[10]  
Gal E(1984)Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind College English 46 635-652