Is Longer Always Better? A Comparison of the Validity of Single-item Versus Multiple-item Measures of Life Satisfaction

被引:0
作者
Veljko Jovanović
Milica Lazić
机构
[1] University of Novi Sad,Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy
来源
Applied Research in Quality of Life | 2020年 / 15卷
关键词
Single-item measure; Life satisfaction; Validity; Test-retest reliability; Age; Gender;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this research was to examine the validity of a single-item life satisfaction scale by comparing it with the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Three studies were conducted on a total of six samples of Serbian undergraduate students, adults, and elderly (total N = 2822). We examined: 1) correlations between a single-item measure of life satisfaction and the SWLS; 2) convergent and criterion-related validity of the two measures; 3) age and gender differences in life satisfaction as measured with the two measures; 4) test-retest reliability of the two measures. The SWLS and the single-item measure were strongly correlated across six samples (mean r = .70). The validity of the two scales was supported, and they generally yielded similar correlations with other constructs. The 10-month test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) was .56 for the SWLS, and .43 for the single-item scale. No consistent gender differences were observed in life satisfaction as measured by both scales among students and adults, but men reported substantially higher life satisfaction than women on SWLS among the elderly. We found that age differences in life satisfaction can depend on the scale used. The present findings support the use of single-item scales of life satisfaction, but also highlight a need for more research beyond validity and reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 692
页数:17
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]  
Baird BM(2010)Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies Social Indicators Research 99 183-203
[2]  
Lucas RE(2016)The nature of doubly concrete constructs and how to identify them Journal of Business Research 69 3427-3429
[3]  
Donnellan MB(2005)Just one question: If one question works why ask several? Editorial Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59 342-345
[4]  
Bergkvist L(2011)A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis Personality and Social Psychology Review 15 290-314
[5]  
Bowling A(2014)Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples Quality of Life Research 23 2809-2818
[6]  
Busseri MA(2014)Velikih pet plus dva: Validacija skraćene verzije [Big Five Plus Two: Validation of a short version] Primenjena Psihologija 7 227-254
[7]  
Sadava SW(2012)Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 434-449
[8]  
Cheung F(1985)The Satisfaction With Life Scale Journal of Personality Assessment 49 71-75
[9]  
Lucas RE(2013)Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales Social Indicators Research 112 497-527
[10]  
Čolović P(2015)Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll International Journal of Psychology 50 135-149