When is Death Bad, When it is Bad?

被引:0
作者
John Martin Fischer
机构
[1] University of California,Department of Philosophy
来源
Philosophia | 2021年 / 49卷
关键词
Death; Badness; Harm; Badness/harm of death; Time of harm of death; Grounding; Truth-making;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
On a view most secularists accept, the deceased individual goes out of existence. How, then, can death be a bad thing for, or harm, the deceased? I consider the doctrine of subsequentism, according to which the bad thing for the deceased, or the harm of death to the deceased, takes place after he or she has died. The main puzzle for this view is to explain how we can predicate a property at a time (such as having a misfortune or being harmed) to an individual who does not exist at that time. This is the Problem of Predication. I consider alternative attempts to solve this puzzle, including one suggested by Ben Bradley, and I argue that they do not succeed. I go on to provide a new way of addressing the Problem of Predication and thus defending subsequentism against this specific threat, contrasting my approach with others currently on offer.
引用
收藏
页码:2003 / 2017
页数:14
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Bradley B(2004)When is death bad for the one who dies? Nous 38 1-28
  • [2] Carlson E(2018)Well-being without being? A reply to feit Utilitas 30 198-208
  • [3] Johansson J(2002)The time of death’s misfortune Nous 36 359-383
  • [4] Feit N(2016)Comparative harm, creation, and death Utilitas 28 136-163
  • [5] Feit N(2016)Accounting for the harm of death Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 89-112
  • [6] Purves D(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined