A comparison of statistical methods to predict the residual lifetime risk

被引:0
作者
Sarah C. Conner
Alexa Beiser
Emelia J. Benjamin
Michael P. LaValley
Martin G. Larson
Ludovic Trinquart
机构
[1] Boston University School of Public Health,Department of Biostatistics
[2] Framingham Heart Study,Department of Neurology
[3] Boston University School of Medicine,Department of Epidemiology
[4] Boston University School of Public Health,Section of Cardiovascular Medicine
[5] Boston University School of Medicine,Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute
[6] Tufts University,Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies
[7] Tufts Medical Center,undefined
来源
European Journal of Epidemiology | 2022年 / 37卷
关键词
Competing risks; Cumulative incidence; Lifetime risk; Left truncation; Survival analysis; Time-to-event data;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Lifetime risk measures the cumulative risk for developing a disease over one’s lifespan. Modeling the lifetime risk must account for left truncation, the competing risk of death, and inference at a fixed age. In addition, statistical methods to predict the lifetime risk should account for covariate-outcome associations that change with age. In this paper, we review and compare statistical methods to predict the lifetime risk. We first consider a generalized linear model for the lifetime risk using pseudo-observations of the Aalen-Johansen estimator at a fixed age, allowing for left truncation. We also consider modeling the subdistribution hazard with Fine-Gray and Royston-Parmar flexible parametric models in left truncated data with time-covariate interactions, and using these models to predict lifetime risk. In simulation studies, we found the pseudo-observation approach had the least bias, particularly in settings with crossing or converging cumulative incidence curves. We illustrate our method by modeling the lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation in the Framingham Heart Study. We provide technical guidance to replicate all analyses in R.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 194
页数:21
相关论文
共 140 条
  • [1] Karmali KN(2013)Adding a life-course perspective to cardiovascular-risk communication Nat Rev Cardiol 10 111-14
  • [2] Lloyd-Jones DM(2007)Lifetime risk of stroke and dementia: current concepts, and estimates from the Framingham study Lancet Neurol 6 1106-1522
  • [3] Seshadri S(2000)Computing estimates of incidence, including lifetime risk: Alzheimer’s disease in the framingham study. the practical incidence estimators (pie) macro Stat Med 19 1495-409
  • [4] Wolf PA(1993)On the use of cause-specific failure and conditional failure probabilities: examples from clinical oncology data J Am Stat Assoc 88 400-65
  • [5] Beiser A(2019)Multistate models and lifetime risk estimation: application to alzheimer’s disease Stat Med 38 1558-386
  • [6] D’Agostino RB(1986)A note on semi-markov models for partially censored data Biometrika 73 379-35
  • [7] Seshadri S(2014)Estimating the lifetime risk of dementia in the canadian elderly population using cross-sectional cohort survival data J Am Stat Assoc 109 24-298
  • [8] Gaynor JJ(2013)Simple risk model predicts incidence of atrial fibrillation in a racially and geographically diverse population: the CHARGE-AF consortium J Am Heart Assoc 2 e000102-509
  • [9] Feuer EJ(2018)Lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation according to optimal, borderline, or elevated levels of risk factors: cohort study based on longitudinal data from the framingham heart study BMJ 361 k1453-49
  • [10] Tan CC(2019)A note on pseudo-observations and left-truncation Biom J 61 290-1446