The feasibility of pragmatic influenza vaccine randomized controlled real-world trials in Denmark and England

被引:0
|
作者
Joshua Nealon
Daniel Modin
Rebecca E. Ghosh
Deborah Rudin
Gunnar Gislason
Helen P. Booth
Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
Rachael Williams
Hilary Shepherd
Eleanor Yelland
Helene Bricout
Sandra S. Chaves
Tor Biering-Sørensen
机构
[1] Sanofi Pasteur Medical Evidence Generation,School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine
[2] The University of Hong Kong,Department of Cardiology
[3] Pokfulam, Clinical Practice Research Datalink
[4] Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,Department of Pulmonology
[5] Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte,Modelling, Epidemiology and Data Science
[6] Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
[7] Sanofi Pasteur Global Medical Affairs,undefined
[8] Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte & Department of Biomedical Sciences,undefined
[9] Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,undefined
[10] University of Copenhagen,undefined
[11] Sanofi Pasteur,undefined
[12] University of Copenhagen,undefined
来源
npj Vaccines | / 7卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We estimated the frequency of non-specific influenza-associated clinical endpoints to inform the feasibility of pragmatic randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE). Hospitalization rates of respiratory, cardiovascular and diabetic events were estimated from Denmark and England’s electronic databases and stratified by age, comorbidity and influenza vaccination status. We included a seasonal average of 4.5 million Danish and 7.2 million English individuals, 17 and 32% with comorbidities. Annually, approximately 1% of Danish and 0.5% of English individuals were hospitalized for selected events, ~50% of them respiratory. Hospitalization rates were 40–50-fold and 2–10-fold higher in those >50 years and with comorbidities, respectively. Our findings suggest that a pragmatic RCT using non-specific endpoints is feasible. However, for outcomes with rates <2.5%, it would require randomization of ~100,000 participants to have the power to detect a rVE difference of ~13%. Targeting selected groups (older adults, those with comorbidities) where frequency of events is high would improve trial efficiency.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Real-World Data and Randomised Controlled Trials: The Salford Lung Study
    David A. Leather
    Rupert Jones
    Ashley Woodcock
    Jørgen Vestbo
    Loretta Jacques
    Mike Thomas
    Advances in Therapy, 2020, 37 : 977 - 997
  • [42] Effectiveness in a Real-World Observation Confirms Efficacy of Controlled Clinical Trials
    Kappetein, Arie Pieter
    Vahanian, Alec
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (04) : 451 - 452
  • [43] ENHANCING RANDIMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS BY LINKING THEM TO REAL-WORLD DATA
    Najafzadeh, Mehdi
    Shimamura, Akiko
    McConnochie, Ben
    Demirci, Sevtap
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 2286 - 2286
  • [44] No inexplicable disagreements between real-world data-based nonrandomized controlled studies and randomized controlled trials were found
    Mathes, Tim
    Rombey, Tanja
    Kuss, Oliver
    Pieper, Dawid
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 133 : 1 - 13
  • [45] Comparative safety of istradefylline in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and real-world studies
    Bette, Sagari
    Qian, Joyce
    Cummings, Hannah
    Shimoda, Hiroo
    Shinoda, Katsumi
    Thai, Ashley
    Batson, Sarah
    Redhead, Gabrielle
    Hodkinson, Alexander
    Truong, Daniel
    CLINICAL PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2025, 12
  • [46] Using real-world evidence to complement evidence from randomized controlled trials on oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention
    Smeets, Mark J. R.
    Cannegieter, Suzanne C.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2024, 21 (08)
  • [47] Patient Profiles in Randomized Controlled Trials Versus a Real-World Study in Psoriatic Arthritis: Scoping Review and Metaanalysis
    Alle, Gelsomina
    Lopez-Medina, Clementina
    Siebert, Stefan
    Lavie, Frederic
    Noel, Wim
    Smolen, Josef S.
    Gossec, Laure
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2025, 52 (02) : 138 - 144
  • [48] Tools and Methods for Real-World Evidence Generation Pragmatic Trials, Electronic Consent, and Data Linkages
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    Foster, P. Jeff
    Saag, Kenneth G.
    RHEUMATIC DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 45 (02) : 275 - +
  • [49] Varenicline and Bupropion for Long-Term Smoking Cessation (the MATCH Study): Protocol for a Real-World, Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zawertailo, Laurie
    Mansoursadeghi-Gilan, Tara
    Zhang, Helena
    Hussain, Sarwar
    Le Foll, Bernard
    Selby, Peter
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2018, 7 (10): : 19 - 27
  • [50] From Randomized Controlled Trials to the Real World: Putting Evidence into Context
    Blonde, Lawrence
    Dendy, Jared A.
    Skolnik, Neil
    White, John R., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 67 (08): : S55 - S60