Beyond Stakeholder Utility Function: Stakeholder Capability in the Value Creation Process

被引:0
作者
Elisabet Garriga
机构
[1] EADA Business School,
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2014年 / 120卷
关键词
Stakeholder theory; Value creation; Empirical model; Amartya Sen; Capabilities; Corporate Social Responsibility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In spite of the thousands of articles on stakeholder theory, research on value creation has had a shorter history and narrower breadth. Only a few studies have researched value creation from stakeholder perspective looking at how stakeholders appropiate value or the processes or activities by which stakeholders create value. Consequently to date, certain questions still remain unanswered regarding how a firm should treat stakeholders in order to create value. Several questions arise specifically from the stakeholder's side: What does "value" mean for a particular group of stakeholders and how do firms create these different types of value? How do we measure the value created by stakeholders? The purpose of this paper is to answer these questions from Amartya Sen's Capability Approach, identifying and measuring stakeholders' capabilities in the value creation process. Stakeholder Capability is the adequate concept for understanding stakeholder welfare rather than the utility function concept. The empirical evidence comes from an in-depth case study of the company The Grobo Group and its stakeholders. According to the results, the following stakeholder capabilities are relevant to value creation: being employable, being autonomus, being innovative, being entreprenurial, being responsive, being socially integrated, being emphatic, being "green" and being healthy.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 507
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Alkire S(2005)Subjective quantitative measures of human agency Social Indicators Research 45 78-98
[2]  
Anand P(2006)Capabilities and achievements: An empirical study Journal of Socio-Economics 35 268-284
[3]  
van Hess M(1988)Structural equations modelling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach Psychological Bulletin 103 411-423
[4]  
Anderson JC(1986)Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy Management Science 32 1231-1241
[5]  
Gerbing DW(1991)Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage Journal of Management 17 99-120
[6]  
Barney J(2003)Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies Strategic Management Journal 24 677-687
[7]  
Barney J(2009)Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance Strategic Management Journal 30 447-456
[8]  
Blyler M(2000)Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy British Journal of Management 11 1-15
[9]  
Coff RW(2007)Firm value creation and levels of strategy Management Decision 45 360-371
[10]  
Bosse DA(2010)How value is created, captured and destroyed European Business Review 22 5479-5495