Foundations of Academic Freedom: Making New Sense of Some Aging Arguments

被引:0
作者
Liviu Andreescu
机构
[1] Spiru Haret University,
来源
Studies in Philosophy and Education | 2009年 / 28卷
关键词
Academic freedom; University functions; Marketplace of ideas; Professional autonomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The article distinguishes between the various arguments traditionally offered as justifications for the principle of academic freedom. Four main arguments are identified, three consequentialist in nature (the argument from truth, the democratic argument, the argument from autonomy), and one nonconsequentialist (a variant of the autonomy argument). The article also concentrates on the specific form these arguments must take in order to establish academic freedom as a principle distinct from the more general principles of freedom of expression and intellectual freedom.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 515
页数:16
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Biesta G(2007)Towards the knowledge democracy? Knowledge production and the civic role of the university Studies in Philosophy and Education 26 467-479
[2]  
Byrne JP(1989)Academic freedom: A ‘special concern of the first amendment’ Yale Law Journal 99 251-340
[3]  
Fallon RH(1993)Two senses of autonomy Stanford Law Review 46 875-905
[4]  
Glenn CL(2000)University mission and academic freedom: Are they irreconcilable? European Journal for Education Law and Policy 4 41-47
[5]  
Greenawalt K(1989)Free speech justifications Columbia Law Review 89 119-155
[6]  
Habermas J(1987)The idea of the university. Learning processes New German Critique 41 3-22
[7]  
Haverhals B(2007)The normative foundations of research-based education: Philosophical notes on the transformation of the modern university idea Studies in Philosophy and Education 26 419-432
[8]  
Horwitz P(2007)Universities as first amendment institutions: Some easy answers and hard questions UCLA Law Review 54 1497-1558
[9]  
O’Neil RM(1996)A researcher’s privilege: Does any hope remain? Law and Contemporary Problems 59 35-49
[10]  
Polanyi M(1947)The foundations of academic freedom The Lancet 249 583-586