Molecular evidence supports a genic capture resolution of the lek paradox

被引:0
作者
Robert J. Dugand
Joseph L. Tomkins
W. Jason Kennington
机构
[1] University of Western Australia,Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences
来源
Nature Communications | / 10卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The genic capture hypothesis, where sexually selected traits capture genetic variation in condition and the condition reflects genome-wide mutation load, stands to explain the presence of abundant genetic variation underlying sexually selected traits. Here we test this hypothesis by applying bidirectional selection to male mating success for 14 generations in replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. We then resequenced the genomes of flies from each population. Consistent with the central predictions of the genic capture hypothesis, we show that genetic variance decreased with success selection and increased with failure selection, providing evidence for purifying sexual selection. This pattern was distributed across the genome and no consistent molecular pathways were associated with divergence, consistent with condition being the target of selection. Together, our results provide molecular evidence suggesting that strong sexual selection erodes genetic variation, and that genome-wide mutation-selection balance contributes to its maintenance.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
Kirkpatrick M(1991)The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek Nature 350 33-38
[2]  
Ryan MJ(1982)The lek paradox is not resolved Theor. Popul. Biol. 22 392-409
[3]  
Taylor PD(2001)The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations Am. Nat. 157 245-261
[4]  
Williams GC(1995)A resolution of the lek paradox Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 260 21-29
[5]  
Kingsolver JG(1996)The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 263 1415-1421
[6]  
Pomiankowski A(1982)Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17 375-393
[7]  
Møller A(1986)Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences Evolution 40 804-816
[8]  
Rowe L(1992)Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits Genetics 130 195-204
[9]  
Houle D(1998)How should we explain variation in the genetic variance of traits? Genetica 102 241-253
[10]  
Andersson M(2000)Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies Nature 406 186-686