Comparison of aerodynamic coefficients of setback tall buildings due to wind load

被引：1

作者：

Bairagi A.K. ^{[1
]}

Dalui S.K. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah

来源：

Asian Journal of Civil Engineering | 2018年 / 19卷 / 2期

关键词：

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Force coefficient; Pressure coefficient; Roof setback; Stepped shape building; Torsional moment coefficient;

D O I：

10.1007/s42107-018-0018-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Irregular and unsymmetrical buildings are the modern trend for architectural and structural engineers, and this type of structure is always taken special care to design. This study focuses on the comparison between two setback buildings. Pressure, force, and torsional moment coefficients are highlighted in this study. The suction at the roof top of single-side setback is 95.84% higher than the both-side setback model. Torsional moment of both-side setback model is 259.02% higher than the single-side setback model. This study says that the both-side setback model is more susceptible than the single-side setback model. © 2018, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.

引用

页码：205 / 221

页数：16

共 30 条

[1]

CFX-Solver Theory Guide, 14, (2012)

[2]

Structural design actions, part 2: Wind actions. Sydney, (2002)

[3]

7-10:2010, (2010)

[4]

Baby S., Jithin P.N., Thomas A.M., A study of wind pressure on tall buildings and its aerodynamic modifications against wind excitation, International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, 3, pp. 1-10, (2015)

[5]

British standard: Loading for buildings part 2. Code of practice for wind loads. London: British Standard Institution, (1997)

[6]

Elshaer A., Bitsuamlak G., Damatty A.E., Aerodynamic shape optimization of tall buildings using twisting and corner modifications, In Proceedings of the 8th International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Application, (2016)

[7]

European committee for standardization (CEN). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures-part 1–4: General actions—Wind actions. European Standard (Eurocode). Europe: European Committee for Standardization (CEN), (2010)

[8]

Franke J., Hirsch C., Jensen A., Krus H., Schatzmann M., Westbury P., Miles S., Wisse J., Wright N.G., Recommendations on the use of CFD in wind engineering, COST Action C14: Impact of wind and storm on city life and built environment, (2004)

[9]

Hossain M.J., Islam M.Q., Ali M., Lift and drag on cylinder of octagonal cross-section in a turbulent stream, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 6, pp. 105-110, (2013)

[10]

Irwin P., Kilpatrick J., Robinson J., Frisque A., Wind and tall buildings: Negatives and positives, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 17, pp. 915-928, (2008)

← 1 2 3 →