Microfluidic fabrication of microcarriers with sequential delivery of VEGF and BMP-2 for bone regeneration

被引:0
作者
Erfan Dashtimoghadam
Farahnaz Fahimipour
Nikita Tongas
Lobat Tayebi
机构
[1] Marquette University School of Dentistry,Adams School of Dentistry
[2] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 10卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Wound instability and poor functional vascularization in bone tissue engineering lead to lack of tissue integration and ultimate failure of engineered grafts. In order to harness the regenerative potential of growth factors and stimulate bone healing, present study aims to design multifunctional cell therapy microcarriers with the capability of sequential delivery of essential growth factors, bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). An on-chip double emulsion method was implemented to generate monodisperse VEGF encapsulated microcarriers. Bio-inspired poly(3,4-dihydroxyphenethylamine) (PDA) was then functionalized to the microcarriers surface for BMP-2 conjugation. The microcarriers were seeded with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) using a dynamic culture technique for cells expansion. Finally, the microcarriers were incorporated into an injectable alginate-RGD hydrogel laden with endothelial cells (ECs) for further analysis. The DNA and calcium content, as well as ALP activity of the construct were analyzed. The confocal fluorescent microscopy was employed to monitor the MSCs and tunneling structure of ECs. Eventually, the capability of developed microcarriers for bone tissue formation was examined in vivo. Microfluidic platform generated monodisperse VEGF-loaded PLGA microcarriers with size-dependent release patterns. Microcarriers generated with the on-chip technique showed more sustained VEGF release profiles compared to the conventional bulk mixing method. The PDA functionalization of microcarriers surface not only provided immobilization of BMP-2 with prolonged bioavailability, but also enhanced the attachment and proliferation of MSCs. Dynamic culturing of microcarriers showcased their great potential to boost MSCs population required for stem cell therapy of bone defects. ALP activity and calcium content analysis of MSCs-laden microcarriers loaded into injectable hydrogels revealed their capability of tunneling formation, vascular cell growth and osteogenic differentiation. The in vivo histology and real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that transplantation of MSC-laden microcarriers supports ectopic bone formation in the rat model. The presented approach to design bioactive microcarriers offer sustained sequential delivery of bone ECM chemical cues and offer an ideal stabilized 3D microenvironment for patient-specific cell therapy applications. The proposed methodology is readily expandable to integrate other cells and cytokines in a tuned spatiotemporal manner for personalized regenerative medicine.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 186 条
[1]  
Verrier S(2016)Tissue engineering and regenerative approaches to improving the healing of large bone defects Eur. Cell Mater. 32 87-110
[2]  
Ramasamy SK(2016)Blood flow controls bone vascular function and osteogenesis Nat. Commun. 7 13601-380
[3]  
Ramasamy SK(2014)Endothelial Notch activity promotes angiogenesis and osteogenesis in bone Nature 507 376-500
[4]  
Kusumbe AP(2005)The role of therapeutic angiogenesis in tissue repair and regeneration Adv. Skin Wound Care 18 491-38
[5]  
Wang L(2016)The roles of vascular endothelial growth factor in bone repair and regeneration Bone 91 30-408
[6]  
Adams RH(2012)Bone tissue engineering: Recent advances and challenges Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 40 363-382
[7]  
Li WW(2012)Vascularized bone tissue engineering: Approaches for potential improvement Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 18 363-376
[8]  
Talcott KE(2018)Engineering vascularized and innervated bone biomaterials for improved skeletal tissue regeneration Mater. Today 21 362-102
[9]  
Zhai AW(2011)Bone regeneration: Current concepts and future directions BMC Med. 9 66-610
[10]  
Kruger EA(2019)Bone grafts: Which is the ideal biomaterial? J. Clin. Periodontol. 46 92-517