Assessment of Different Spectral Unmixing Techniques on Space Borne Hyperspectral Imagery

被引:0
作者
Kumar V. [1 ]
Pandey K. [1 ]
Panda C. [1 ]
Tiwari V. [1 ]
Agrawal S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Indian Space Research Organisation(ISRO), 4, Kalidas Road, Uttarakhand, Dehradun
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Hyperspectral; LSU; Mixed pixels; MTMF and SPU; Spectral Unmixing;
D O I
10.1007/s41976-022-00071-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Spectral unmixing decomposes the mixed pixels into constituent land cover features present in that pixel. This can be understood through the concepts of affine, convex and projective geometries. Spectral unmixing is difficult to implement in coarser spatial resolution space-borne hyperspectral data, due to the natural heterogeneity of the different land cover features. Linear spectral unmixing (LSU) follows linear equations for generating fractional coefficients; however, it contains limitations like its inability to handle noisy pixels, least-square error calculation, etc. Mixture tuned matched filtering (MTMF) is a partial unmixing technique in which user-defined targets are mapped. This approach uses a matched filter (MF) and linear mixture theory in combination. Whereas simplex projection unmixing (SPU) technique is nonlinear and is utilized for resolving problems such as fully constrained least square and projecting a point onto a simplex. In this study, Hyperion data was used for performing spectral unmixing using LSU, MTMF, and SPU techniques. The unmixing results obtained were compared and validated using available images from geo-portals. The abundance images of SPU were observed better than MTMF and LSU in terms of the material identification. The variation in the percentage aerial coverage of the land cover features in the mixed pixel is found closer in the abundance results of SPU, i.e., 0.1–3.4% whereas MTMF and LSU have a variation of 0.6–5.2% and 1.9–8.7%, respectively. Rule-based classification was performed on the “abundance images” and SPU classification outperformed the other two techniques, as it enabled differentiation of most of the land cover features. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 140
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Bioucas-Dias J.M., Plaza A., Camps-Valls G., Et al., Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges, IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag, 1, pp. 6-36, (2013)
  • [2] Eismann M.T., Hyperspectral Remote Sensing, (2012)
  • [3] Rast M., Painter T.H., Earth observation imaging spectroscopy for terrestrial systems: an overview of its history, techniques, and applications of its missions, Surv Geophys, 40, pp. 303-331, (2019)
  • [4] Fountanas L., Principal Components Based Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Data, (2004)
  • [5] Cavalli R.M., Fusilli L., Pascucci S., Et al., Hyperspectral sensor data capability for retrieving complex urban land cover in comparison with multispectral data: Venice City case study (Italy), Sensors, 8, pp. 3299-3320, (2008)
  • [6] Ravel S., Fossati C., Bourennane S., Spectral Unmixing of Hyperspectral Images in the Presence of Small Targets, MDPI, 7, 1, (2018)
  • [7] Heylen R., Scheunders P., Hyperspectral intrinsic dimensionality estimation with nearest-neighbor distance ratios, IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, 6, pp. 570-579, (2013)
  • [8] Clevers J.G.P.W., Zurita-Milla R., 3 - Multisensor and multiresolution image fusion using the linear mixing model, Image Fusion, pp. 67-84, (2008)
  • [9] Drumetz L., Chanussot J., Jutten C., Spectral unmixing: a derivation of the extended linear mixing model from the Hapke model, IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 17, pp. 1866-1870, (2020)
  • [10] Dobigeon N., Altmann Y., Brun N., Moussaoui S., Chapter 6 - Linear and nonlinear unmixing in hyperspectral imaging, Data Handling in Science and Technology, pp. 185-224, (2016)