Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials: new insights in healthy subjects

被引:0
|
作者
Arnaud Fumal
Valentin Bohotin
Michel Vandenheede
Laurence Seidel
Victor De Pasqua
Alain Maertens de Noordhout
Jean Schoenen
机构
[1] CHR Citadelle Hospital,University Department of Neurology
[2] University of Liège,Department of Neuroanatomy
[3] University of Liège,Department of Medical Informatics, CHU Hospital
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2003年 / 150卷
关键词
rTMS; Healthy subjects; Visual cortex; Visual evoked potentials; Habituation; Reproducibility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In a previous comparative study with migraineurs, we found in 24 normal subjects that the amplitude of the pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (PR-VEP) in the first block of 100 responses and its habituation over 6 sequential blocks were significantly decreased after 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), while 10 Hz rTMS had no significant effect. We report here our results on the reproducibility of the rTMS effect studied in ten of these subjects by repeating the recordings for each frequency three times on different days. We have also reanalysed the data obtained in 24 normal subjects, looking separately at the results in those stimulated at an intensity equal to phosphene threshold (group 1; n=14) and those stimulated at 110% of motor threshold because of unelicitable phosphenes (group 2; n=10). We finally determined the precise duration of the rTMS effect. Despite some interindividual variability, the effects of both rTMS frequencies on first block amplitude, habituation between first and sixth block and habituation slope over the six blocks were highly reproducible. The only difference between the two groups of subjects was the effect of 1 Hz rTMS on the second measured PR-VEP component. Whereas first block amplitude of the first P1-N1 component and habituation were decreased in both groups, such a decrease was found for the second P1-N2 component only in group 1 stimulated at phosphene threshold. The dishabituation of the N1-P1 component after 1 Hz rTMS was maximal at 15 min, but lasted up to 33 min, while that of P1-N2 disappeared after 3 min. There was a non-significant trend (p=0.06) for a reduction of first block amplitude after 10 Hz rTMS in the total group of subjects, but no effect on habituation. The inhibitory effect of 1 Hz rTMS, which reduces in healthy controls both first block PR-VEP amplitude and habituation, probably by decreasing the preactivation excitability level of the underlying visual cortex, is thus reproducible and long lasting. Long trains of 10 Hz rTMS tend to attenuate reproducibly the cortical preactivation level in normal subjects, but they do not affect habituation at all, which contrasts with their effect in migraineurs, in whom, as previously reported, they significantly correct the habituation deficit. The absence of an effect of 1 Hz rTMS on PR-VEP P1-N2 in subjects stimulated at 110% of motor threshold may be explained by the deeper anatomical location of the cortical generators of this component and the lower stimulation intensity used. Taken together our results confirm that the effect of rTMS on the underlying cortex depends on several variables such as frequency, intensity and level of cortical preactivation.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 340
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation influences mood in healthy male volunteers
    Schaller, Gerd
    Lenz, Bernd
    Friedrich, Kerstin
    Dygon, Dominika
    Richter-Schmidinger, Tanja
    Jacobi, Andrea
    Mueller, Sandra E.
    Maihoefner, Christian
    Sperling, Wolfgang
    Kornhuber, Johannes
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2011, 45 (09) : 1178 - 1183
  • [22] The Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia: Insights from EEG Microstates
    Pan, Zhilin
    Xiong, Dongsheng
    Xiao, Huisi
    Li, Jiahui
    Huang, Yuanyuan
    Zhou, Jing
    Chen, Jun
    Li, Xiaobo
    Ning, Yuping
    Wu, Fengchun
    Wu, Kai
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2021, 299
  • [23] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation?
    Priori, Aberto
    Hallett, Mark
    Rothwell, John C.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2009, 2 (04) : 241 - 245
  • [24] Improved Discrimination of Visual Stimuli Following Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Waterston, Michael L.
    Pack, Christopher C.
    PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (04):
  • [25] Altered recovery from inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in subjects with photosensitive epilepsy
    Bocci, Tommaso
    Caleo, Matteo
    Restani, Laura
    Barloscio, Davide
    Rossi, Simone
    Sartucci, Ferdinando
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 127 (10) : 3353 - 3361
  • [26] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for ALS
    Dileone, M.
    Profice, P.
    Pilato, F.
    Ranieri, F.
    Capone, F.
    Musumeci, G.
    Florio, L.
    Di Iorio, R.
    Di Lazzaro, V.
    CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2010, 9 (03) : 331 - 334
  • [27] Observation of Cognition Effects Improvement by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Chen, Huijuan
    Gao, Hao
    2019 IEEE MTT-S INTERNATIONAL MICROWAVE BIOMEDICAL CONFERENCE (IMBIOC 2019), 2019,
  • [28] Multiple effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on neuropsychiatric disorders
    Ikeda, Tetsurou
    Kurosawa, Masaru
    Morimoto, Chikao
    Kitayama, Shigeo
    Nukina, Nobuyuki
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 436 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [29] Electroencephalogram and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Boutros, NN
    Berman, RM
    Hoffman, R
    Miano, AP
    Campbell, D
    Ilmoniemi, R
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2000, 12 (03) : 166 - 169
  • [30] Positive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on attention in ADHD Subjects: A randomized controlled pilot study
    Bloch, Y.
    Harel, E. V.
    Aviram, S.
    Govezensky, J.
    Ratzoni, G.
    Levkovitz, Y.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 11 (05): : 755 - 758