Evaluation of Nonparametric Machine-Learning Algorithms for an Optimal Crop Classification Using Big Data Reduction Strategy

被引:0
作者
Al-Awar B. [1 ,2 ]
Awad M.M. [2 ]
Jarlan L. [3 ]
Courault D. [1 ]
机构
[1] UMR 1114 EMMAH, INRAE, Avignon University, Domaine St Paul, Avignon
[2] Remote Sensing Center, CNRS-L, Beirut
[3] Spatial Centre for the Study of the Biosphere, Toulouse
关键词
Agriculture; Artificial neural network; Lebanon; Machine learning; Nonparametric; Sentinel-1; Sentinel-2; Supervised classification;
D O I
10.1007/s41976-022-00072-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate crop classification can support analyses of food security, environmental, and climate changes. Most of the current research studies have focused on applying available algorithms to classify dominant crops on the landscape using one source of remotely sensed data due to geoprocessing constraints (e.g., big data access, availability, and processing power). In this research, we compared four classification algorithms, including the support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), regression tree (CART), and backpropagation network (BPN), to select a robust and efficient classification algorithm able to classify accurately many crop types. We used multiple sources of satellite images such as Sentinel-1 (S1) and Sentinel-2 (S2) and developed a new cropping classification method for a study site in the Bekaa valley, Lebanon, fully implemented on Google Earth Engine Platform, which minimized those geoprocessing constraints. The algorithm selection was based on their popularity, availability, simplicity, similarity, and diversity. In addition, we adopted different strategies that included changing the number of crops. The first strategy is to reduce the number of collected S2 images thereafter S1; the second strategy is to use S2 images separately and then combining S2 and S1. This study results proved that the RF is the most robust algorithm for crop classification, showing the highest overall accuracy (OA) (95.4%) and a kappa index of 0.94, followed by BPN, SVM, and CART, respectively. The performance of these algorithms based on major crop types such as wheat or potato showed that CART is the highest with OA (98%) followed by RF, SVM, and BPN, respectively. Nevertheless, CART fails to classify other minor crop types. We concluded that RF is the best algorithm for classifying different crop types in the study area, using multiple remote sensing data sources. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 153
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Abdiansah A., Retantyo W., Time complexity analysis of support vector machines (SVM) in LibSVM, Int J Comput Appl, 128, 3, pp. 28-34, (2015)
[2]  
Awad M.M., Chehdi K., Nasri A., Multi-component image segmentation: a comparative analysis between SOM and HGA, Int J Remote Sens, 30, 3, pp. 595-610, (2009)
[3]  
Awad M., Cooperative evolutionary classification algorithm for hyperspectral images, J Appl Remote Sens, 14, 1, (2020)
[4]  
Azar R., Villa P., Stroppiana D., Crema A., Boschetti M., Brivio A., Assessing in-season crop classification performance using satellite data: a test case in Northern Italy, Eur J Remote Sens, 49, 1, pp. 361-380, (2016)
[5]  
Berger M., Moreno J., Johannessen J., Levelt P., Hanssen R., ESA's Sentinel missions in support of Earth system science, Remote Sens Environ, 120, pp. 84-90, (2012)
[6]  
Breiman L., Bagging predictors, Mach Learn, 24, 2, pp. 123-140, (1996)
[7]  
Breiman L., Random forests, Mach Learn, 45, pp. 5-32, (2001)
[8]  
Brockmann C., Fomferra N., Snap – the Sentinels Application Platform, (2015)
[9]  
Cohen J., A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educ Psychol Measur, 20, pp. 37-46, (1960)
[10]  
Congalton R., A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, Remote Sens Environ, 37, 1, pp. 35-46, (1991)