Interest groups and political parties in Central and Eastern Europe

被引:0
作者
Szczepan Czarnecki
Emilia Piotrowska
机构
[1] Maria Curie-Skłodowska University,
[2] Warsaw School of Economics,undefined
来源
Interest Groups & Advocacy | 2021年 / 10卷
关键词
Interest groups; Political parties; CEE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In many democratic systems, there is a tradition of interactions between political parties and interest organizations. However, for the CEE region, the factors driving such contacts remain partially undiscovered. Therefore, taking the organized interests’ perspective, we examine what factors influence the frequency of contacts with political parties, what types of parties are most attractive to groups and what kind of interest groups’ resources facilitates such contacts. The study relies on data from a large-scale survey of organized interests, bringing in a comparative perspective of the four selected countries: Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia. The results show that nearly half of interest groups in the region do not form any lobby routines with political parties, which is similar to the results of recent research in long-established democracies. However, regarding the other half, we see different patterns of contact depending on the country. The article finds strong support for the importance of the dominant party status for interest groups, but not necessarily for the number of seats that party holds in the parliament. Against the background of a fairly balanced picture of the Czech Republic and Slovenia, our results indicate extremely different attitudes of interest groups toward political parties in Hungary and Poland, countries willingly juxtaposed with each other in recent years. The results for Poland clearly show that the stronger the party's position and the greater the number of its seats in parliament, the greater the interest of the groups in contact. On the contrary, in Hungary groups rather declare contacts with opposition parties and those with a small and medium number of seats in parliament. Regarding the importance of resources, we found that among the three types of analyzed resources—financial horizon, different types of expertise and participation in umbrella organizations—only the last two are relevant.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 398
页数:22
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Albareda Adrià(2020)Prioritizing professionals? How the democratic and professionalized nature of interest groups shapes their degree of access to EU officials European Political Science Review 12 485-501
[2]  
Allern Elin Haugsgjerd(2012)Political parties and interest groups: disentangling complex relationships Party Politics 18 7-25
[3]  
Bale Tim(2019)All about the money? A cross-national study of parties’ relations with trade unions in 12 western democracies Party Politics 27 407-417
[4]  
Allern Elin Haugsgjerd(2020)Competition and interaction: party ties to interest groups in a multidimensional policy space European Journal of Political Research 60 275-294
[5]  
Hansen Vibeke Wøien(2020)Industry politicization and interest group campaign contribution strategies Journal of Politics 82 1008-1025
[6]  
Otjes Simon(2013)Why interest groups do what they do: assessing the explanatory potential of ‘exchange’ approaches Interest Groups & Advocacy 2 227-250
[7]  
Rasmussen Anne(2020)Interest groups in multi-level contexts: European integration as cross-cutting issue in party-interest group contacts Politics and Governance 8 61-71
[8]  
Røed Maiken(2019)Lobbying strategies and success: inside and outside lobbying in European Union legislative politics European Political Science Review 11 57-74
[9]  
Bale Tim(2007)Critical resource dependencies and the Europeanization of domestic interest groups Journal of European Public Policy 14 460-481
[10]  
Allern Elin Haugsgjerd(2005)Party competition in emerging democracies: representation and effectiveness in post-communism and beyond Democratization 12 331-356