Individual Differences in the Order/Chaos Balance of the Brain Self-Organization

被引:0
作者
Díaz H. [1 ]
Maureira F. [2 ]
Cohen E. [3 ]
Córdova F. [1 ]
Palominos F. [1 ]
Otárola J. [1 ]
Cañete L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Laboratory of Neurocognitive Engineering & Laboratory of Neuromanagement, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Santiago de Chile, Santiago
[2] Facultad de Patrimonio Cultural y Educación, Universidad SEK de Chile, Santiago
[3] KIM, Kosmos in Movement, Santiago
关键词
Brain; Chaos; Dynamical systems; EEG; Fractal geometry; Time series;
D O I
10.1007/s40745-015-0051-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We used fractal geometry and fractal dimension introductory argumentation as a framework to start understanding dynamical and complex biological systems to then introduce Hurst exponent estimation of chaos/no-chaos balance trend to explore the phenomenology and the information content of EEG data through time. We searched for measure proxy dynamical variables as potential biomarkers and/or endo-phenotypes that help us to figure out the multidimensionality and different time-scale of simultaneous and crossed functional phenomena that manifests in the brain during executing any challenging task. We found consistencies in the way intra- and inter-individual differences express themselves through the EEG time series data analysis, and some degree of specificity and specialization in the frontal, temporal and occipital locations as well as brain interhemispheric cross-talk interaction modulating the chaos/no-chaos balance in the brain, during a projective process of imaging a dancing choreography. We recorded the brain activity of N = 9 professional dancers while executing the instruction of to imagine (by mean of a typical projective visualization) a future dancing performance as part of the requirement for to approve a specialization modern dance course and workshop (Kosmos In Movement, 2015). © 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 438
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]  
Akin M., Comparison of wavelet transform and FFT methods in the analysis of EEG signals, J Med Syst, 26, 3, pp. 241-247, (2003)
[12]  
Brazier M.A.B., Casby J.U., Crosscorrelation and autocorrelation studies of electroencephalographic potentials, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 4, 2, pp. 201-211, (1952)
[13]  
Barlow J.S., Autocorrelation and crosscorrelation analysis in electroencephalography, IRE Trans Med Electron, 1000, pp. 179-183, (1959)
[14]  
Petsche H., Approaches to verbal, visual and musical creativity by EEG coherence analysis, Int J Psychophysiol, 24, 1-2, pp. 145-159, (1996)
[15]  
Tucker D.M., Roth D.L., Bair T.B., Functional connections among cortical regions: topography of EEG coherence, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 63, 3, pp. 242-250, (1986)
[16]  
Lehmann D., Skrndies W., Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man-a review, Prog Neurobiol, 23, 3, pp. 227-250, (1984)
[17]  
Naatanen R., Selective attention and evoked potentials inhumans—A critical review, Biol Psychol, 2, 4, pp. 237-307, (1975)
[18]  
Stam C.J., Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: review of an emerging field, Clin Neurophysiol, 116, 10, pp. 2266-2301, (2005)
[19]  
Seely A.J., Macklem P.T., Complex systems and the technology of variability analysis, Crit Care, 8, 6, pp. R37-R84, (2004)
[20]  
De Bot K., Lowie W., Verspoor M., A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition, Biling: Lang Cognit, 10, 1, pp. 7-21, (2007)