The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review

被引:0
作者
Nicolas Banholzer
Adrian Lison
Dennis Özcelik
Tanja Stadler
Stefan Feuerriegel
Werner Vach
机构
[1] ETH Zurich,Department of Management, Technology, and Economics
[2] ETH Zurich,Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering
[3] ETH Zurich,Chemistry | Biology | Pharmacy Information Center
[4] LMU Munich,LMU Munich School of Management
[5] Basel Academy for Quality and Research in Medicine,Department of Environmental Sciences
[6] University of Basel,undefined
来源
European Journal of Epidemiology | 2022年 / 37卷
关键词
Non-pharmaceutical interventions; Social distancing measures; Control measures; COVID-19; Systematic review; Methodology review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as school closures and stay-at-home orders, have been implemented around the world to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Their effectiveness in improving health-related outcomes has been the subject of numerous empirical studies. However, these studies show fairly large variation among methodologies in use, reflecting the absence of an established methodological framework. On the one hand, variation in methodologies may be desirable to assess the robustness of results; on the other hand, a lack of common standards can impede comparability among studies. To establish a comprehensive overview over the methodologies in use, we conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions between January 1, 2020 and January 12, 2021 (n = 248). We identified substantial variation in methodologies with respect to study setting, outcome, intervention, methodological approach, and effectiveness assessment. On this basis, we point to shortcomings of existing studies and make recommendations for the design of future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1003 / 1024
页数:21
相关论文
共 441 条
[1]  
Hale T(2021)A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker) Nat Hum Behav 5 529-538
[2]  
Angrist N(2021)Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19 Science 371 eabd9338-1312
[3]  
Goldszmidt R(2020)Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions Nat Hum Behav 4 1303-870
[4]  
Kira B(2021)Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the number of new infections with COVID-19 during the first epidemic wave PLoS ONE 16 859-1246
[5]  
Petherick A(2020)Association between statewide school closure and COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the US JAMA 324 1237-261
[6]  
Phillips T(2021)All things equal? Heterogeneity in policy effectiveness against COVID-19 spread in Chile World Dev 137 257-267
[7]  
Brauner JM(2020)Strong social distancing measures in the United States reduced the COVID-19 growth rate Health Aff 39 262-293
[8]  
Mindermann S(2020)Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe Nature 584 281-52
[9]  
Sharma M(2020)The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic Nature 584 1-835
[10]  
Johnston D(2020)Assessing the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Switzerland Swiss Med Wkly 150 805-1260