Shining the Light of Research on Lumosity

被引:22
作者
Bainbridge K. [1 ]
Mayer R.E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, CA
关键词
Brain-training games; Cognitive training; Computer game training; Lumosity; Transfer effects;
D O I
10.1007/s41465-017-0040-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Lumosity is a subscription-based suite of online brain-training games, intended to improve cognitive skills. Due to an influx of products designed to train cognition through games such as Lumosity, it is important to determine their effectiveness for the sake of consumers and for the potential implications of any training effects for theories of transfer of cognitive skills. Two training experiments were conducted using the Lumosity platform. Participants were divided into three groups: those who trained with five attention games in Lumosity (attention group), those who trained with five flexibility games in Lumosity (flexibility group), and an inactive control group. Participants were assessed on accuracy and response time for two cognitive tests of attention (useful field of view and change detection) and two cognitive tests of flexibility (Wisconsin card sort and Stroop) both before and after a training period. In experiment 1, the training period was 3 h spread over four sessions. In experiment 2, the training period was 15 to 20 h spread over an average of 73 sessions. The trained groups did not show significantly greater pretest-to-posttest gains than the control group on any measures in either experiment, except in experiment 2 where the flexibility group significantly outperformed the other two groups on Stroop response time and UFOV reaction time. A practical implication concerns the lack of strong evidence for the effectiveness of brain-training games to improve cognitive skills. A theoretical implication concerns the domain specificity of cognitive skill learning from brain training games. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 62
页数:19
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Au J., Sheehan E., Tsai N., Duncan G.J., Buschkuehl M., Jaeggi S.M., Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 2, pp. 366-377, (2015)
[2]  
Berg E., A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking, Journal of General Psychology., 39, pp. 15-22, (1948)
[3]  
Boot W.R., Blakely D.P., Simons D.J., Do action video games improve perception and cognition?, Frontiers in Psychology, 2, (2011)
[4]  
Conover W.J., Iman R.L., Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics, The American Statistician, 35, 3, (1981)
[5]  
Deveau J., Jaeggi S.M., Zordan V., Phung C., Seitz A.R., How to build better memory training games, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, (2014)
[6]  
Edwards J.D., Vance D.E., Wadley V.G., Cissell G.M., Roenker D.L., Ball K.K., Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, pp. 529-543, (2005)
[7]  
Finn M., McDonald S., Computerised cognitive training for older persons with mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study using a randomised controlled trial design, Brain Impairment, 12, 3, pp. 187-199, (2011)
[8]  
Gee J.P., Good Video Games+ Good Learning, pp. 1-82, (2007)
[9]  
Golden C.J., A manual for the clinical and experimental use of the stroop color and word test, (1978)
[10]  
Green C., Bavelier D., Learning, attentional control, and action video games, Current Biology, 22, 6, pp. R197-R206, (2012)