Resistance Mechanisms in Hepatitis C Virus: implications for Direct-Acting Antiviral Use

被引:0
作者
Sabrina Bagaglio
Caterina Uberti-Foppa
Giulia Morsica
机构
[1] IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele,Division of Infectious Diseases
来源
Drugs | 2017年 / 77卷
关键词
Sustain Virological Response; Virologic Failure; Sustain Virological Response Rate; Sofosbuvir; Genetic Barrier;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-based regimens are currently approved that provide one or more interferon-free treatment options for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (G) 1–6. The choice of a DAA regimen, duration of therapy, and use of ribavirin depends on multiple viral and host factors, including HCV genotype, the detection of resistance-associated amino acid (aa) substitutions (RASs), prior treatment experience, and presence of cirrhosis. In regard to viral factors that may guide the treatment choice, the most important is the infecting genotype because a number of DAAs are genotype-designed. The potency and the genetic barrier may also impact the choice of treatment. One important and debated possible virologic factor that may negatively influence the response to DAAs is the presence of baseline RASs. Baseline resistance testing is currently not routinely considered or recommended for initiating HCV treatment, due to the overall high response rates (sustained virological response >90%) obtained. Exceptions are patients infected by HCV G1a when initiating treatment with simeprevir and elbasvir/grazoprevir or in those with cirrhosis prior to daclatasvir/sofosbuvir treatment because of natural polymorphisms demonstrated in sites of resistance. On the basis of these observations, first-line strategies should be optimized to overcome treatment failure due to HCV resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1055
页数:12
相关论文
共 647 条
  • [1] Di Bisceglie AM(2000)Natural history of hepatitis C: its impact on clinical management Hepatology 31 1014-1018
  • [2] Pawlotsky JM(2014)New hepatitis C therapies: the toolbox, strategies, and challenges Gastroenterology 146 1176-1192
  • [3] Pawlotsky JM(2015)Hepatitis C treatment: the data flood goes on. An update from The Liver Meeting 2014 Gastroenterology 148 468-479
  • [4] Shen J(2016)Metabolism and disposition of the hepatitis C Protease inhibitor paritaprevir in humans Drug Metab Dispos 44 1164-1173
  • [5] Serby M(2017)Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for the treatment of hepatitis C Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 13 105-112
  • [6] Reed A(2005)Consensus proposals for a unified system of nomenclature of hepatitis C virus genotypes Hepatology 42 962-973
  • [7] Lee AJ(2004)Genetic diversity and evolution of hepatitis C virus—15 years on J Gen Virol 85 3173-3188
  • [8] Zhang X(2015)Genetic diversity underlying the envelope glycoproteins of hepatitis C virus: structural and functional consequences and the implications for vaccine design Viruses. 7 3995-4046
  • [9] Marsh K(2006)Hepatitis C virus population dynamics during infection Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 299 261-284
  • [10] Khatri A(2012)New advances in the molecular biology of hepatitis C virus infection: towards the identification of new treatment targets Gut 61 i25-i35