Comparison of emerging contaminants in receiving waters downstream of a conventional wastewater treatment plant and a forest-water reuse system

被引:0
作者
Andrew D. McEachran
Melanie L. Hedgespeth
Seth R. Newton
Rebecca McMahen
Mark Strynar
Damian Shea
Elizabeth Guthrie Nichols
机构
[1] North Carolina State University,Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, College of Natural Resources
[2] National Exposure Research Laboratory,Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science
[3] Office of Research and Development,undefined
[4] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,undefined
[5] Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Research Participation Program,undefined
[6] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,undefined
[7] North Carolina State University,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2018年 / 25卷
关键词
Wastewater; Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs); Forest-water reuse; Nontargeted analysis; Surface water; Water reuse;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forest-water reuse (FWR) systems treat municipal, industrial, and agricultural wastewaters via land application to forest soils. Previous studies have shown that both large-scale conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and FWR systems do not completely remove many contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) before release of treated wastewater. To better characterize CECs and potential for increased implementation of FWR systems, FWR systems need to be directly compared to conventional WWTPs. In this study, both a quantitative, targeted analysis and a nontargeted analysis were utilized to better understand how CECs release to waterways from an FWR system compared to a conventional treatment system. Quantitatively, greater concentrations and total mass load of CECs was exhibited downstream of the conventional WWTP compared to the FWR. Average summed concentrations of 33 targeted CECs downstream of the conventional system were ~ 1000 ng/L and downstream of the FWR were ~ 30 ng/L. From a nontargeted chemical standpoint, more tentatively identified chemicals were present, and at a greater relative abundance, downstream of the conventional system as well. Frequently occurring contaminants included phthalates, pharmaceuticals, and industrial chemicals. These data indicate that FWR systems represent a sustainable wastewater treatment alternative and that emerging contaminant release to waterways was lower at a FWR system than a conventional WWTP.
引用
收藏
页码:12451 / 12463
页数:12
相关论文
共 164 条
  • [91] Gómez MJ(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [92] Hernando MD(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [93] García-Reyes JF(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [94] Fernández-Alba AR(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [95] McEachran AD(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [96] Shea D(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [97] Bodnar W(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [98] Nichols EG(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [99] McEachran AD(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [100] Shea D(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined