Comparison of emerging contaminants in receiving waters downstream of a conventional wastewater treatment plant and a forest-water reuse system

被引:0
作者
Andrew D. McEachran
Melanie L. Hedgespeth
Seth R. Newton
Rebecca McMahen
Mark Strynar
Damian Shea
Elizabeth Guthrie Nichols
机构
[1] North Carolina State University,Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, College of Natural Resources
[2] National Exposure Research Laboratory,Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science
[3] Office of Research and Development,undefined
[4] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,undefined
[5] Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Research Participation Program,undefined
[6] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,undefined
[7] North Carolina State University,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2018年 / 25卷
关键词
Wastewater; Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs); Forest-water reuse; Nontargeted analysis; Surface water; Water reuse;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forest-water reuse (FWR) systems treat municipal, industrial, and agricultural wastewaters via land application to forest soils. Previous studies have shown that both large-scale conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and FWR systems do not completely remove many contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) before release of treated wastewater. To better characterize CECs and potential for increased implementation of FWR systems, FWR systems need to be directly compared to conventional WWTPs. In this study, both a quantitative, targeted analysis and a nontargeted analysis were utilized to better understand how CECs release to waterways from an FWR system compared to a conventional treatment system. Quantitatively, greater concentrations and total mass load of CECs was exhibited downstream of the conventional WWTP compared to the FWR. Average summed concentrations of 33 targeted CECs downstream of the conventional system were ~ 1000 ng/L and downstream of the FWR were ~ 30 ng/L. From a nontargeted chemical standpoint, more tentatively identified chemicals were present, and at a greater relative abundance, downstream of the conventional system as well. Frequently occurring contaminants included phthalates, pharmaceuticals, and industrial chemicals. These data indicate that FWR systems represent a sustainable wastewater treatment alternative and that emerging contaminant release to waterways was lower at a FWR system than a conventional WWTP.
引用
收藏
页码:12451 / 12463
页数:12
相关论文
共 164 条
  • [1] Aalizadeh R(2016)Quantitative structure–retention relationship models to support nontarget high-resolution mass spectrometric screening of emerging contaminants in environmental samples J Chem Inf Model 56 1384-1398
  • [2] Thomaidis NS(2013)New trends in the analytical determination of emerging contaminants and their transformation products in environmental waters Environ Sci Pollut Res 20 3496-3515
  • [3] Bletsou AA(2015)Suspect screening of large numbers of emerging contaminants in environmental waters using artificial neural networks for chromatographic retention time prediction and high resolution mass spectrometry data analysis Sci Total Environ 538 934-941
  • [4] Gago-Ferrero P(2009)The occurrence of illicit and therapeutic pharmaceuticals in wastewater effluent and surface waters in Nebraska Environ Pollut 157 786-791
  • [5] Agüera A(2017)Comprehensive comparison of in silico MS/MS fragmentation tools of the CASMI contest: database boosting is needed to achieve 93% accuracy J Cheminform 9 32-498
  • [6] Martínez Bueno MJ(2018)Evaluation of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant upgraded with ozonation and biological post-treatments: abatement of micropollutants, formation of transformation products and oxidation by-products Water Res 129 486-4802
  • [7] Fernández-Alba AR(2017)Expanded target-chemical analysis reveals extensive mixed-organic-contaminant exposure in U.S. streams Environ Sci Technol 51 4792-1318
  • [8] Bade R(2010)Environmental occurrence and reproductive effects of the pharmaceutical fluoxetine in native freshwater mussels Environ Toxicol Chem 29 1311-142
  • [9] Bijlsma L(2003)Waterborne and sediment toxicity of fluoxetine to select organisms Chemosphere 52 135-147A
  • [10] Miller TH(1984)Land use of wastewater and sludge Environ Sci Technol 18 140A-16