Removing Obstacles in Neuroscience Drug Discovery: The Future Path for Animal Models

被引:0
作者
Athina Markou
Christian Chiamulera
Mark A Geyer
Mark Tricklebank
Thomas Steckler
机构
[1] School of Medicine,Department of Psychiatry
[2] University of California San Diego,Department of Medicine and Public Health
[3] Section of Pharmacology,Department of Psychiatry
[4] University of Verona,undefined
[5] Lilly Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience,undefined
[6] Lilly Research Laboratories,undefined
[7] Eli Lilly and Co.,undefined
[8] Ltd.,undefined
[9] Erl Wood Manor,undefined
[10] Research and Early Development Europe,undefined
[11] Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development,undefined
来源
Neuropsychopharmacology | 2009年 / 34卷
关键词
animal models; drug discovery; psychiatry; medication development; review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite great advances in basic neuroscience knowledge, the improved understanding of brain functioning has not yet led to the introduction of truly novel pharmacological approaches to the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disorders. This situation has been partly attributed to the difficulty of predicting efficacy in patients based on results from preclinical studies. To address these issues, this review critically discusses the traditional role of animal models in drug discovery, the difficulties encountered, and the reasons why this approach has led to suboptimal utilization of the information animal models provide. The discussion focuses on how animal models can contribute most effectively to translational medicine and drug discovery and the changes needed to increase the probability of achieving clinical benefit. Emphasis is placed on the need to improve the flow of information from the clinical/human domain to the preclinical domain and the benefits of using truly translational measures in both preclinical and clinical testing. Few would dispute the need to move away from the concept of modeling CNS diseases in their entirety using animals. However, the current emphasis on specific dimensions of psychopathology that can be objectively assessed in both clinical populations and animal models has not yet provided concrete examples of successful preclinical–clinical translation in CNS drug discovery. The purpose of this review is to strongly encourage ever more intensive clinical and preclinical interactions to ensure that basic science knowledge gained from improved animal models with good predictive and construct validity readily becomes available to the pharmaceutical industry and clinical researchers to benefit patients as quickly as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 89
页数:15
相关论文
共 449 条
  • [1] Amitai N(2007)Cognitive-disruptive effects of the psychotomimetic phencyclidine and attenuation by atypical antipsychotic medications in rats Psychopharmacology 193 521-537
  • [2] Semenova S(2008)Classification of anxiety and depressive disorders: problems and solutions Depress Anxiety 25 274-281
  • [3] Markou A(2008)Erice statement on drug innovation Br J Clin Pharmacol 65 440-441
  • [4] Andrews G(2006)Modeling madness in mice: one piece at a time Neuron 52 179-196
  • [5] Anderson TM(2007)Neuronal nicotinic receptors: a perspective on two decades of drug discovery research Biochem Pharmacol 74 1092-1101
  • [6] Slade T(1992)Methylphenidate and neuroleptic effects on oral word production in schizophrenia Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 5 262-271
  • [7] Sunderland M(2002)Do animal models of anxiety predict anxiolytic-like effects of antidepressants? Psychopharmacology 163 121-141
  • [8] Apolone G(2008)Advances in endophenotyping schizophrenia World Psychiatry 7 11-18
  • [9] Bassi M(2001)Do we need any more new antiepileptic drugs? Epilepsy Res 45 3-6
  • [10] Begaud B(2003)Characterization of the effects of bupropion on the reinforcing properties of nicotine and food in rats Synapse 50 20-28