An Extended Hackathon Model for Collaborative Education in Medical Innovation

被引:0
作者
Jason K. Wang
Ravinder D. Pamnani
Robson Capasso
Robert T. Chang
机构
[1] Stanford University,Mathematical and Computational Science Department
[2] Stanford University School of Medicine,Stanford Byers Center for Biodesign
[3] Stanford University School of Medicine,Department of Otolaryngology
[4] Stanford University School of Medicine, Head and Neck Surgery, Sleep Surgery Division
[5] Stanford Byers Eye Institute,Department of Ophthalmology
来源
Journal of Medical Systems | 2018年 / 42卷
关键词
Medical technology; Medical innovation; Medical education; Biodesign; Hackathon;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To support the next generation of healthcare innovators - whether they be engineers, designers, clinicians, or business experts by training – education in the emerging field of medical innovation should be made easily and widely accessible to undergraduate students, graduate students, and young professionals, early in their careers. Currently, medical innovation curricula are taught through semester-long courses or year-long fellowships at a handful of universities, reaching only a limited demographic of participants. This study describes the structure and preliminary outcomes of a 1–2 week “extended hackathon” course that seeks to make medical innovation education and training more accessible and easily adoptable for academic medical centers. Eight extended hackathons were hosted in five international locations reaching 245 participants: Beijing (June 2015 and August 2016), Hong Kong (June 2016, 2017, and 2018), Curitiba (July 2016), Stanford (October 2017), and São Paulo (May 2018). Pre- and post-hackathon surveys asking respondents to self-assess their knowledge in ten categories of medical innovation were administered to quantify the perceived degree of learning. Participants hailed from a diverse range of educational backgrounds, domains of expertise, and academic institutions. On average, respondents (n = 161) saw a greater than twofold increase (114.1%, P < 0.001) from their pre- to post-hackathon scores. In this study, the extended hackathon is presented as a novel educational model to teach undergraduate and graduate students a foundational skillset for medical innovation. Participants reported gaining significant knowledge across all ten categories assessed. To more robustly assess the educational value of extended hackathons, a standardized assessment for medical innovation knowledge needs to be developed, and a larger sample size of participants surveyed.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Yock PG(2011)Teaching biomedical technology innovation as a discipline Sci. Transl. Med. 3 92cm18-1810
  • [2] Brinton TJ(2013)Outcomes from a postgraduate biomedical technology innovation training program: The first 12 years of Stanford biodesign Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41 1803-44
  • [3] Zenios SA(2017)Health hackathons: Theatre or substance? A survey assessment of outcomes from healthcare-focused hackathons in three countries BMJ Innov. 3 37-264
  • [4] Brinton TJ(2014)Less noise, more hacking: How to deploy principles from MIT’s hacking medicine to accelerate health care Int. J. Technol. Assess. Heal. Care 30 260-142
  • [5] Kurihara CQ(2016)Healthcare hackathons provide educational and innovation opportunities: A case study and best practice recommendations J. Med. Syst. 40 177-10
  • [6] Camarillo DB(2017)Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon Teach. Higher Edu. 22 129-undefined
  • [7] Pietzsch JB(2015)The med AppJam: A model for an interprofessional student-centered mHealth app competition J. Med. Syst. 39 34-undefined
  • [8] Gorodsky J(2011)Embrace failure to start up success Nature 477 133-undefined
  • [9] Zenios SA(2017)A Systems Approach to Healthcare Innovation Using the MIT Hacking Medicine Model Cell Systems 5 6-undefined
  • [10] Doshi R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined