Visual outcomes, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction of pseudophakic mini-monovision using a new monofocal intraocular lens

被引:0
作者
Ella SeoYeon Park
Hyunmin Ahn
Sung Uk Han
Ikhyun Jun
Kyoung Yul Seo
Eung Kweon Kim
Tae-im Kim
机构
[1] Yonsei University College of Medicine,The Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital
[2] Yonsei University College of Medicine,Corneal Dystrophy Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology
[3] Saevit Eye Hospital,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Modified monovision—or “mini-monovision”—is an alternative method to multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) for treating presbyopia. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with the new enhanced monofocal Tecnis Eyhance (ICB00) IOLs with the mini-monovision technique to improve near vision. In this retrospective case series, the medical records of 50 patients (100 eyes) who underwent bilateral cataract surgery were reviewed. Patients were divided into the Emmetropia and Mini-monovision groups based on the postoperative spherical equivalent and residual myopia. The binocular visual acuity for far (4 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) distances, binocular defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, visual symptoms, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction rates were evaluated at 3 months postoperatively. The binocular uncorrected distance and intermediate visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, incidence of photic phenomena, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, the binocular uncorrected near visual acuities and spectacle independence rates were significantly better in the Mini-monovision group (p < 0.001). Conclusively, the pseudophakic mini-monovision technique using enhanced monofocal IOLs may be a promising option for presbyopia correction in patients unsuitable for multifocal IOLs.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Lee CM(2017)The global state of cataract blindness Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 28 98-103
[2]  
Afshari NA(2017)Cataracts Lancet 390 600-612
[3]  
Liu Y-C(1996)Refractive aspects to cataract surgery Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 7 21-25
[4]  
Wilkins M(2017)Multifocal intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses Asia-Pac. J. Ophthalmol. 6 339-349
[5]  
Kim T(2018)Pseudophakic mini-monovision: High patient satisfaction, reduced spectacle dependence, and low cost BMC Ophthalmol. 18 1-6
[6]  
Malyugin B(2021)Visual performance and patient satisfaction after implantation of extended range-of-vision IOLs: Bilateral implantation vs 2 different mix-and-match approaches J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 47 192-197
[7]  
Mehta JS(2019)Cost-effectiveness analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses compared to monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery Am. J. Ophthalmol. 208 305-312
[8]  
Fine IH(2014)Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 40 313-322
[9]  
Hoffman RS(2016)Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016 12-249
[10]  
Breyer DR(2011)Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses: A meta-analysis Clin. Ophthalmol. 5 45-648