Low-dose dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT-SPECT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease

[1] Hendel RC(2009)ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/ SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 53 2201-2229

[2] Berman DS(2018)Negative predictive value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary computed tomography angiography: a meta-analysis J Nucl Cardiol 25 1588-1597

[3] Di Carli MF(2004)Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT J Nucl Cardiol 11 171-185

[4] Heidenreich PA(2007)Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease J Nucl Cardiol 14 521-528

[5] Henkin RE(2010)Diagnostic and clinical benefit of combined coronary calcium and perfusion assessment in patients undergoing PET/CT myocardial perfusion stress imaging J Nucl Cardiol 17 188-196

[6] Pellikka PA(2018)Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by (82)Rb PET/CT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45 521-529

[7] Green R(2017)Prognostic value of atherosclerotic burden and coronary vascular function in patients with suspected coronary artery disease Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44 2290-2298

[8] Cantoni V(2009)Novel solid-state-detector dedicated cardiac camera for fast myocardial perfusion imaging: multicenter comparison with standard dual detector cameras J Nucl Cardiol 16 927-934

[9] Petretta M(2013)Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve using dynamic SPECT imaging in humans: a feasibility study J Nucl Med 54 873-879

[10] Acampa W(2018)First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45 1079-1090

[1] Hendel RC(2009)ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/ SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 53 2201-2229

[2] Berman DS(2018)Negative predictive value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary computed tomography angiography: a meta-analysis J Nucl Cardiol 25 1588-1597

[3] Di Carli MF(2004)Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT J Nucl Cardiol 11 171-185

[4] Heidenreich PA(2007)Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease J Nucl Cardiol 14 521-528

[5] Henkin RE(2010)Diagnostic and clinical benefit of combined coronary calcium and perfusion assessment in patients undergoing PET/CT myocardial perfusion stress imaging J Nucl Cardiol 17 188-196

[6] Pellikka PA(2018)Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by (82)Rb PET/CT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45 521-529

[7] Green R(2017)Prognostic value of atherosclerotic burden and coronary vascular function in patients with suspected coronary artery disease Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44 2290-2298

[8] Cantoni V(2009)Novel solid-state-detector dedicated cardiac camera for fast myocardial perfusion imaging: multicenter comparison with standard dual detector cameras J Nucl Cardiol 16 927-934

[9] Petretta M(2013)Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve using dynamic SPECT imaging in humans: a feasibility study J Nucl Med 54 873-879

[10] Acampa W(2018)First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45 1079-1090