Chitin-fibroin-hydroxyapatite membrane for guided bone regeneration: micro-computed tomography evaluation in a rat model

被引:10
作者
Baek Y.-J. [1 ]
Kim J.-H. [1 ]
Song J.-M. [1 ]
Yoon S.-Y. [2 ]
Kim H.-S. [3 ]
Shin S.-H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan
[2] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Good Gang-An Hospital, Busan
[3] Department of Biomaterials Science, College of Natural Resources and Life Science, Pusan National University, Miryang
关键词
Chitin-fibroin-hydroxyapatite; Guided bone regeneration; Micro-computed tomography; Rat calvarial defect;
D O I
10.1186/s40902-016-0060-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique, many materials have been used for improving biological effectiveness by adding on membranes. The new membrane which was constructed with chitin-fibroin-hydroxyapatite (CNF/HAP) was compared with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®) by means of micro-computed tomography. Methods: Fifty-four rats were used in this study. A critical-sized (8 mm) bony defect was created in the calvaria with a trephine bur. The CNF/HAP membrane was prepared by thermally induced phase separation. In the experimental group (n = 18), the CNF/HAP membrane was used to cover the bony defect, and in the control group (n = 18), a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®) was used. In the negative control group (n = 18), no membrane was used. In each group, six animals were euthanized at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after surgery. The specimens were analyzed using micro-CT. Results: Bone volume (BV) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the new bone showed significant difference between the negative control group and membrane groups (P < 0.05). However, between two membranes, the difference was not significant. Conclusions: The CNF/HAP membrane has significant effect on the new bone formation and has the potential to be applied for guided bone regeneration. © 2016, Baek et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]  
Medical applications of hydroxyapatite: Bone mineral, drug delivery system, cancer & HIV, IVH & CAPD, dental implant, . Ishiyaku Euroamerica, 1994
[22]  
Chang C.H., Lin F.H., Lin C.C., Chou C.H., Liu H.C., Cartilage tissue engineering on the surface of a novel gelatin-calcium-phosphate biphasic scaffold in a double-chamber bioreactor, J Biomed Mater Res, 71, 2, pp. 313-321, (2004)
[23]  
Kim H.W., Kim H.E., Salih V., Stimulation of osteoblast responses to biomimetic nanocomposites of gelatin–hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffolds, Biomaterials, 26, 25, pp. 5221-5230, (2005)
[24]  
Wilson O.C., Hull J.R., Surface modification of nanophase hydroxyapatite with chitosan, Materials Science and Engineering. C., 28, 3, pp. 434-437, (2008)
[25]  
Hutmacher D.W., Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage, Biomaterials, 21, 24, pp. 2529-2543, (2000)
[26]  
Santin M., Motta A., Freddi G., Cannas M., In vitro evaluation of the inflammatory potential of the silk fibroin, J Biomed Mater Res, 46, 3, pp. 382-389, (1999)
[27]  
Kuo S.M., Chang S.J., Chen T.W., Kuan T.C., Guided tissue regeneration for using a chitosan membrane: An experimental study in rats, J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 76, 2, pp. 408-415, (2006)
[28]  
Park Y.J., Kim K.H., Lee J.Y., Ku Y., Lee S.J., Min B.M., Chung C.P., Immobilization of bone morphogenetic protein‐2 on a nanofibrous chitosan membrane for enhanced guided bone regeneration, Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 43, 1, pp. 17-24, (2006)
[29]  
Jung U.W., Song K.Y., Kim C.S., Lee Y.K., Cho K.S., Kim C.K., Choi S.H., Effects of a chitosan membrane coated with polylactic and polyglycolic acid on bone regeneration in a rat calvarial defect, Biomedical Materials, 2, 3, pp. S101-S105, (2007)
[30]  
Zitzmann N.U., Naef R., Scharer P., Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, 6, pp. 844-852, (1997)