The relationships of motor-evoked potentials to hand dexterity, motor function, and spasticity in chronic stroke patients: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

被引:0
作者
Engin Cakar
Gulseren Akyuz
Oguz Durmus
Levent Bayman
Ilker Yagci
Evrim Karadag-Saygi
Osman Hakan Gunduz
机构
[1] Istanbul Medipol University School of Medicine,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
[2] Marmara University School of Medicine,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
[3] Gulhane Military Medical Academy,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
[4] Haydarpasa Training Hospital,Clinical Trials Statistical & Data Management Center
[5] University of Iowa,undefined
来源
Acta Neurologica Belgica | 2016年 / 116卷
关键词
Dexterity; Motor-evoked potential; Neurorehabilitation; Spasticity; Transcranial magnetic stimulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The standardization of patient evaluation and monitoring methods has a special importance in evaluating the effectiveness of therapeutic methods using drugs or rehabilitative techniques in stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between clinical instruments and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked neurophysiological parameters in stroke patients. This study included 22 chronic post-stroke patients who were clinically assessed using the Motricity Index (MI), finger-tapping test (FTT), Motor Activity Log (MAL) 28, Brunnstrom motor staging and Ashworth Scale (ASH). Motor-evoked potential (MEP) latency and amplitude, resting motor threshold (rMT) and central motor conduction time (CMCT) were measured with TMS. Shorter MEP-latency, shorter CMCT, higher motor-evoked potential amplitude, and diminished rMT exhibited significant correlations with clinical measures evaluating motor stage, dexterity, and daily life functionality. rMT exhibited a negative correlation with hand and lower extremity Brunnstrom stages (r = −0.64, r = −0.51, respectively), MI score (r = −0.48), FTT score (r = −0.69), and also with amount of use scale and quality of movement scale of MAL 28 scores (r = −0.61, r = −0.62, respectively). Higher MEP amplitude and diminished rMT showed positive correlations with reduced ASH score (r = −0.65, r = 0.44, respectively). The TMS-evoked neurophysiologic parameters including MEP latency, amplitude, rMT and CMCT generally have positive correlation with clinical measures which evaluate motor stage, dexterity and daily life functionality. Additionally, spasticity has also remarkable relationships with MEP amplitude and rMT. These results suggest that TMS-evoked neurophysiological parameters were useful measures for monitoring post-stroke patients.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 487
页数:6
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] Aksakalli E(2009)Outcome scales in stroke rehabilitation Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 55 168-172
  • [2] Turan Y(2003)Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology Lancet Neurol 2 145-156
  • [3] Sendur OF(2007)Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity Brain 130 170-180
  • [4] Kobayashi M(2006)Hand function and motor cortical output poststroke: are they related? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87 627-634
  • [5] Pascual-Leone A(2002)Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity Clin Neurophysiol 113 2025-2029
  • [6] Stinear CM(2004)Motor outcome after subcortical stroke correlates with the degree of cortical reorganization Clin Neurophysiol 115 2144-2150
  • [7] Barber PA(2012)The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke—a systematic review of the literature Funct Neurol 27 79-84
  • [8] Smale PR(2012)Prognostic value of cortically induced motor evoked activity by TMS in chronic stroke: caveats from a revealing single clinical case BMC Neurol 12 35-249
  • [9] Coxon JP(2004)Immediate and long-term changes in corticomotor output in response to rehabilitation: correlation with functional improvements in chronic stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair 18 230-1115
  • [10] Fleming MK(2008)An investigation into the agreement between clinical, biomechanical and neurophysiological measures of spasticity Clin Rehabil 22 1105-8