Motor network connectivity predicts neuroplastic response following theta burst stimulation in healthy adults

被引:0
作者
Brenton Hordacre
Mitchell R. Goldsworthy
Lynton Graetz
Michael C. Ridding
机构
[1] Innovation,Lifespan Human Neurophysiology Group, Adelaide Medical School
[2] Implementation and Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health,Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme
[3] University of South Australia,Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School
[4] The University of Adelaide,undefined
[5] South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI),undefined
[6] University of Adelaide,undefined
来源
Brain Structure and Function | 2021年 / 226卷
关键词
Electroencephalography; Functional connectivity; Motor cortex; Plasticity; Theta burst stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A patterned repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, known as continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), can suppress corticospinal excitability via mechanisms that appear similar to long-term depression synaptic plasticity. Despite much potential, this technique is currently limited by substantial response variability. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether baseline resting state functional connectivity is a determinant of response to cTBS. Eighteen healthy young adults participated in up to three experimental sessions. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to quantify change in corticospinal excitability following cTBS. Three minutes of resting electroencephalographic activity was recorded, and functional connectivity was estimated using the debiased weighted phase lag index across different frequency bands. Partial least squares regression identified models of connectivity between a seed region (C3) and the whole scalp that maximally accounted for variance in cTBS responses. There was no group-level effect of a single cTBS train or spaced cTBS trains on corticospinal excitability (p = 0.092). A low beta frequency band model of connectivity accounted for the largest proportion of variance in spaced cTBS response (R2 = 0.50). Based on the low beta frequency model, a-priori regions of interest were identified and predicted 39% of variance in response to spaced cTBS at a subsequent session. Importantly, weaker connectivity between the seed electrode (C3) and a cluster approximating a frontocentral region was associated with greater spaced cTBS response (p = 0.02). It appears M1—frontocentral networks may have an important role in determining the effects of cTBS on corticospinal excitability.
引用
收藏
页码:1893 / 1907
页数:14
相关论文
共 260 条
[1]  
Andersson CA(2000)The N-way toolbox for MATLAB Chemometr Intell Lab 52 1-4
[2]  
Bro R(2016)A tutorial review of functional connectivity analysis methods and their interpretational pitfalls Front Syst Neurosci 44 225-239
[3]  
Bastos AM(2014)Response, remission and drop-out rates following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials Psychol Med 34 537-541
[4]  
Schoffelen J-M(1995)Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI Magn Reson Med 17 656-664
[5]  
Berlim M(2007)Abnormal oscillatory synchronisation in the motor system leads to impaired movement Curr Opin Neurobiol 24 1697-1707
[6]  
Van den Eynde F(2014)Network connectivity and individual responses to brain stimulation in the human motor system Cereb Cortex 25 77-81
[7]  
Tovar-Perdomo S(2008)Gender-specific modulation of short-term neuroplasticity in the visual cortex induced by transcranial direct current stimulation Vis Neurosci 6 284-1453
[8]  
Daskalakis Z(1994)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology Psychol Assess 14 1444-1673
[9]  
Biswal B(2001)Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to test connections to primary motor areas from frontal and medial cortex in humans Neuroimage 129 1659-278
[10]  
Zerrin Yetkin F(2006)Plasticity in the human central nervous system Brain 1 269-21