Use of decrease in apparent diffusion coefficient values to predict infarct age

被引:2
|
作者
Provenzale J.M. [1 ,2 ]
Stinnett S.S. [3 ,4 ]
Engelter S.T. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
[2] Departments of Radiology, Oncology and Biomedical Engineering, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta
[3] Department of Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
[4] Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
[5] Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel
[6] Neurorehabilitation Unit, Felix Platter-Spital, Basel
关键词
Age; Apparent diffusion coefficient; Infarct; Prediction; Stroke;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-010-0869-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the study was to determine the ability to predict infarct age based on decrease in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We retrospectively identified 94 individuals (age range 16 years to 91 years; mean 63.7∈+∈14.1 years) who underwent magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging at our institution over a course of 14 months whose infarct age could be reliably determined within 1 h. A single observer measured ADC values within the center of the infarct and compared them against values in contralateral normal tissue. We examined the ability of four ADC decrease thresholds (i.e., >50%, >40%, >30%, and >20%) to predict infarct age of <24 and <48 h. Levels of ADC decrease in infarcts were as follows: <20%, n=9; 20-29%, n=21; 30-39%, n=25; 40-49%, n=23; >50%, n=16. For prediction of infarct age <24 h, sensitivity for the four ADC decrease thresholds ranged from 25% to 94%, specificity ranged from 10% to 85%, positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 18% to 25%, and negative predictive value (NPV) ranged from 85% to 89%. For prediction of infarct age <48 h, sensitivity ranged from 23% to 98%, specificity ranged from 15% to 87%, PPV ranged from 46% to 56%, and NPV ranged from 60% to 89%. Test performance characteristics for predicting infarct age of <24 and <48 h were relatively poor. In particular, PPV was very low for predicting infarcts <24 h old. © 2010 Am Soc Emergency Radiol.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 395
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Apparent diffusion coefficient values of the normal uterus: Interindividual variations during menstrual cycle
    Tsili, A. C.
    Argyropoulou, M. I.
    Tzarouchi, L.
    Dalkalitsis, N.
    Koliopoulos, G.
    Paraskevaidis, E.
    Tsampoulas, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (08) : 1951 - 1956
  • [42] Evaluation of T2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient of the masseter muscle by clenching
    Shiraishi, T.
    Chikui, T.
    Yoshiura, K.
    Yuasa, K.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [43] Secondary Signal Change and an Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Decrease of the Substantia Nigra After Striatal Infarction
    Nakajima, Makoto
    Inatomi, Yuichiro
    Okigawa, Takashi
    Yonehara, Toshiro
    Hirano, Teruyuki
    STROKE, 2013, 44 (01) : 213 - 216
  • [44] Role of Diffusion Weighted Imaging with Corresponding Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions
    Varshitha G.R.
    Sakalecha A.K.
    Darshan A.V.
    Chaithanya A.
    Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2022, 19 (06) : 383 - 389
  • [45] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and Tumor Proliferation
    Wang, Xi Zhen
    Wang, Bin
    Gao, Zhi Qin
    Liu, Jin Gang
    Liu, Zuo Qin
    Niu, Qing Liang
    Sun, Zhen Kui
    Yuan, Yu Xiao
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 29 (06) : 1360 - 1366
  • [46] Clinical Value of a Nomogram Model Based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Within 1 cm of the Tumor Cavity to Predict Postoperative Progression of Glioma
    Cheng, Mengyu
    Pang, Shutong
    Wang, Zhanqiu
    Zhao, Yuemei
    Li, Wenfei
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 180 : E149 - E157
  • [47] Clinical Utility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Can ADC Values Contribute to Assess the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer?
    Itou, Yasushi
    Nakanishi, Katsuyuki
    Narumi, Yoshifumi
    Nishizawa, Yasuko
    Tsukuma, Hideaki
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (01) : 167 - 172
  • [48] Diagnostic Significance of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values with Diffusion Weighted MRI in Breast Cancer: a Meta-Analysis
    Sun, Jiang-Hong
    Jiang, Li
    Guo, Fei
    Zhang, Xiu-Shi
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (19) : 8271 - 8277
  • [49] Apparent diffusion coefficient values are superior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness
    Li, Chunmei
    Chen, Min
    Wang, Jianye
    Wang, Xuan
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Chen
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2017, 58 (02) : 232 - 239
  • [50] Use of Preoperative Apparent Diffusion Coefficients to Predict Brain Tumor Grade
    Darbar, Aneela
    Waqas, Muhammad
    Enam, Syed Faaiz
    Mahmood, Shaikh D.
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (03):