Use of decrease in apparent diffusion coefficient values to predict infarct age

被引:2
|
作者
Provenzale J.M. [1 ,2 ]
Stinnett S.S. [3 ,4 ]
Engelter S.T. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
[2] Departments of Radiology, Oncology and Biomedical Engineering, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta
[3] Department of Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
[4] Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
[5] Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel
[6] Neurorehabilitation Unit, Felix Platter-Spital, Basel
关键词
Age; Apparent diffusion coefficient; Infarct; Prediction; Stroke;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-010-0869-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the study was to determine the ability to predict infarct age based on decrease in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We retrospectively identified 94 individuals (age range 16 years to 91 years; mean 63.7∈+∈14.1 years) who underwent magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging at our institution over a course of 14 months whose infarct age could be reliably determined within 1 h. A single observer measured ADC values within the center of the infarct and compared them against values in contralateral normal tissue. We examined the ability of four ADC decrease thresholds (i.e., >50%, >40%, >30%, and >20%) to predict infarct age of <24 and <48 h. Levels of ADC decrease in infarcts were as follows: <20%, n=9; 20-29%, n=21; 30-39%, n=25; 40-49%, n=23; >50%, n=16. For prediction of infarct age <24 h, sensitivity for the four ADC decrease thresholds ranged from 25% to 94%, specificity ranged from 10% to 85%, positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 18% to 25%, and negative predictive value (NPV) ranged from 85% to 89%. For prediction of infarct age <48 h, sensitivity ranged from 23% to 98%, specificity ranged from 15% to 87%, PPV ranged from 46% to 56%, and NPV ranged from 60% to 89%. Test performance characteristics for predicting infarct age of <24 and <48 h were relatively poor. In particular, PPV was very low for predicting infarcts <24 h old. © 2010 Am Soc Emergency Radiol.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 395
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Differentiating Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions
    Bozkurt, Tugba Bostan
    Koc, Gonca
    Sezgin, Gulten
    Altay, Canan
    Gelal, M. Fazil
    Oyar, Orhan
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 33 (03) : 294 - 300
  • [32] Determination of the cutoff level of apparent diffusion coefficient values for detection of prostate cancer
    Nagayama, Masako
    Watanabe, Yuji
    Terai, Akito
    Araki, Tohru
    Notohara, Kenji
    Okumura, Akira
    Amoh, Yoshiki
    Ishimori, Takayoshi
    Nakashita, Satoru
    Dodo, Yoshihiro
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 29 (07) : 488 - 494
  • [33] Determination of the cutoff level of apparent diffusion coefficient values for detection of prostate cancer
    Masako Nagayama
    Yuji Watanabe
    Akito Terai
    Tohru Araki
    Kenji Notohara
    Akira Okumura
    Yoshiki Amoh
    Takayoshi Ishimori
    Satoru Nakashita
    Yoshihiro Dodo
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2011, 29 : 488 - 494
  • [34] Decrease in pituitary apparent diffusion coefficient in normal appearing brain correlates with hypopituitarism following traumatic brain injury
    Zheng, P.
    He, B.
    Tong, W. S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION, 2014, 37 (03) : 309 - 312
  • [35] A feasibility study on monitoring the evolution of apparent diffusion coefficient decrease during thermal ablation
    Plata, Juan C.
    Holbrook, Andrew B.
    Marx, Michael
    Salgaonkar, Vasant
    Jones, Peter
    Pascal-Tenorio, Aurea
    Bouley, Donna
    Diederich, Chris
    Sommer, Graham
    Pauly, Kim Butts
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (09) : 5130 - 5137
  • [36] Apparent diffusion coefficient thresholds do not predict the response to acute stroke thrombolysis
    Loh, PS
    Butcher, KS
    Parsons, MW
    MacGregor, L
    Desmond, PM
    Tress, BM
    Davis, SM
    STROKE, 2005, 36 (12) : 2626 - 2631
  • [37] Does reversal of ischemia on diffusion-weighted imaging reflect higher apparent diffusion coefficient values?
    Lutsep, HL
    Nesbit, GM
    Berger, RM
    Coshow, WR
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2001, 11 (03) : 313 - 316
  • [38] Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer
    Kato, Seiji
    Kamijima, Shuichi
    Inaoka, Tsutomu
    Kamiya, Naoto
    Sasai, Daisuke
    Terada, Hitoshi
    Hiruta, Nobuyuki
    Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 52 (03) : 180 - 185
  • [39] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Thresholds and Diffusion Lesion Volume in Acute Stroke
    Thomas, Ralph G. R.
    Lymer, G. Katherine
    Armitage, Paul A.
    Chappell, Francesca M.
    Carpenter, Trevor
    Karaszewski, Bartosz
    Dennis, Martin S.
    Wardlaw, Joanna M.
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2013, 22 (07) : 906 - 909
  • [40] Evaluation of the Imaging Process for a Novel Subtraction Method Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values
    Hamada, Kentaro
    Kuroda, Masahiro
    Yoshimura, Yuuki
    Khasawneh, Abdullah
    Barham, Majd
    Tekiki, Nouha
    Sugianto, Irfan
    Bamgbose, Babatunde O.
    Konishi, Kohei
    Sugimoto, Kohei
    Ishizaka, Hinata
    Kurozumi, Akira
    Matsushita, Toshi
    Ohno, Seiichiro
    Kanazawa, Susumu
    Asaumi, Junichi
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2021, 75 (02) : 139 - 145