Forest management facing climate change - an ecosystem model analysis of adaptation strategies

被引:0
作者
Anna Maria Jönsson
Fredrik Lagergren
Benjamin Smith
机构
[1] Lund University,Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
来源
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | 2015年 / 20卷
关键词
Climate change; Forest management; LPJ-GUESS; Risk analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To adapt to climate change, forest managers request information on management options for obtaining environmental, societal and economic goals. In this study, we assess the potential of adaptive forest management to influence the productivity and storm sensitivity of nemoral and boreal forest. The forest growth across Sweden over the 21st century was simulated by the ecosystem model LPJ-GUESS, comparing four management options: 1) default forest management, 2) shorter rotation period 3) increased fraction of broadleaved trees and 4) continuous cover forestry. The simulations indicated that a management strategy implemented by a majority of forest owners can have a large-scale effect on the standing volume and risk taking. The modelled risk of storm damage, expressed as the combined effect of tree properties, ground frost and wind load, was higher in the southern than in the northern part of the country due to latitudinal variations in all three components. We conclude that whereas the probability of a significant volume loss increase with the age of a forest, the calculated economic loss can be as high in young and mid-age forest stands. To reduce the risk of storm damage and fulfil a variety of management goals, a portfolio of adaptation strategies is needed. It should include active measures such as tree-species mixtures to spread the risks and shorter rotation periods of highly exposed stands, as well as reactive measures such as salvage and sanitary cutting to reduce the risk of subsequent spruce bark beetle outbreaks.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 220
页数:19
相关论文
共 309 条
[1]  
Ahlström A(2012)Too early to infer a global NPP decline since 2000 GeophysRes Lett 39 169-211
[2]  
Miller PA(1968)Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe Ann Bot Fenn 5 229-247
[3]  
Smith B(2012)How does silviculture affect storm damage in forests of south-western Germany? Results from empirical modeling based on long-term observations Eur J For Res 131 163-186
[4]  
Ahti T(1996)The role of climate variability and global warming in the dieback of Northern Hardwoods Water Air Soil Pollut 91 1031-1039
[5]  
Hämet-Ahti L(2009)Spring 2007 warmth and frost: phenology, damage and refoliation in a temperate deciduous forest Funct Ecol 23 51-60
[6]  
Jalas J(2009)Occurrence and pathogenicity of fungi in necrotic and non-symptomatic shoots of declining common ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Sweden Eur J For Res 128 261-281
[7]  
Albrecht A(2005)Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management a review and synthesis Forest Policy Econ 7 6-41
[8]  
Hanewinkel M(2012)Är anpassning av skogsskötseln nödvändigt i dagsläget för att minska skogsskador i ett förändrat klimat? Del 1 – analyser på beståndsnivå Sver lantbruksuniversitet Arbetsrapport 43 279-299
[9]  
Bauhus J(1990)Framework for the analysis of risks in forest management and silvicultural investments For Ecol Manag 36 70-463
[10]  
Kohnle U(2009)Skogsskötselns ekonomi Skogssötselserien 18 452-4