The yield of CT pulmonary angiograms to exclude acute pulmonary embolism

被引:42
作者
Costa A.F. [1 ,2 ]
Basseri H. [2 ]
Sheikh A. [1 ,2 ]
Stiell I. [3 ,4 ]
Dennie C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Medical Imaging, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa
[2] Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
[3] Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
[4] Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
关键词
Computed tomography pulmonary angiography; D-dimer; Emergency medicine; Pulmonary embolism;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-013-1169-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is accumulating evidence regarding the overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE). We evaluated the yield of CTPA studies performed at our tertiary care hospital between April 2008 and March 2010 for emergency patients (ED), inpatients (INPT), and intensive care unit inpatients (ICU). For each patient group, we also compared CTPA positivity rates among the following: daytime and on-call studies, 1 year before and after institution of an Emergency Radiology division, interpreting thoracic and non-thoracic radiologists, and individual emergency physicians. Patients with a history of PE and indeterminate studies were excluded. The diagnosis of PE was based on the radiology report. D-dimer values obtained within 24 h prior to CTPA were recorded. A total of 3,571/4,757 CTPA studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The fraction of positive studies was 252/1,677 (15.0 %) ED, 255/1,548 (16.5 %) INPT, and 62/346 (17.9 %) ICU. There was no difference in yield between patient groups, daytime vs. on-call studies, before vs. after instituting an emergency radiology division, and thoracic vs. non-thoracic radiologists (p>0.05). For individual emergency physicians, the mean CTPA positivity rate was 15.4 % but varied considerably (σ=8.5 %, range, 0-38.5 %). In comparison to other recent studies, our yield of ED CTPA is relatively high but varied widely among individual emergency physicians. While the reasons for such differences require further investigation, our results reinforce the importance of a strong clinical assessment in the work-up of suspected PE. © 2013 Am Soc Emergency Radiol.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 141
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Huisman, M.V., Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography (2006) Journal of the American Medical Association, 295 (2), pp. 172-179. , http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/295/2/172, DOI 10.1001/jama.295.2.172
[2]  
Perrier, A., Roy, P.M., Sanchez, O., Le Gal, G., Meyer, G., Gourdier, A.L., Furber, A., Bounameaux, H., Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism (2005) N Engl J Med, 352 (17), pp. 1760-1768. , doi:10.1056/NEJMoa042905
[3]  
Kavanagh, E.C., O'Hare, A., Hargaden, G., Murray, J.G., Risk of Pulmonary Embolism after Negative MDCT Pulmonary Angiography Findings (2004) American Journal of Roentgenology, 182 (2), pp. 499-504
[4]  
Quiroz, R., Kucher, N., Zou, K.H., Kipfmueller, F., Costello, P., Goldhaber, S.Z., Schoepf, U.J., Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: A systematic review (2005) Journal of the American Medical Association, 293 (16), pp. 2012-2017. , DOI 10.1001/jama.293.16.2012
[5]  
Moores, L.K., Jackson Jr., W.L., Shorr, A.F., Jackson, J.L., Meta-analysis: Outcomes in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism managed with computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (2004) Annals of Internal Medicine, 141 (11), pp. 866-874
[6]  
Anderson, D.R., Kahn, S.R., Rodger, M.A., Kovacs, M.J., Morris, T., Hirsch, A., Lang, E., Wells, P.S., Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: A randomized controlled trial (2007) Journal of the American Medical Association, 298 (23), pp. 2743-2753. , http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/298/23/2743
[7]  
Glassroth, J., Imaging of pulmonary embolism: Too much of a good thing? (2007) JAMA, 298 (23), pp. 2788-2789. , doi:10.1001/jama.298.23.2788
[8]  
Wiener, R.S., Schwartz, L.M., Woloshin, S., Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: Evidence of overdiagnosis (2011) Arch Intern Med, 171 (9), pp. 831-837. , doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.178
[9]  
Burge, A.J., Freeman, K.D., Klapper, P.J., Haramati, L.B., Increased diagnosis of pulmonary embolismwithout a corresponding decline in mortality during the CTera (2008) Clin Radiol, 63 (4), pp. 381-386. , doi:10.1016/j.crad.2007.10.004
[10]  
Sheh, S.H., Bellin, E., Freeman, K.D., Haramati, L.B., Pulmonary embolism diagnosis and mortality with pulmonary CT angiography versus ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy: Evidence of overdiagnosis with CT? (2012) AJR Am J Roentgenol, 198 (6), pp. 1340-1345. , doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6426