Minimum Membrane Bending Energies of Fusion Pores

被引:0
作者
Meyer B. Jackson
机构
[1] University of Wisconsin Madison,Department of Physiology
来源
Journal of Membrane Biology | 2009年 / 231卷
关键词
Membrane fusion; Exocytosis; Membrane mechanics; Membrane elasticity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Membranes fuse by forming highly curved intermediates, culminating in structures described as fusion pores. These hourglass-like figures that join two fusing membranes have high bending energies, which can be estimated using continuum elasticity models. Fusion pore bending energies depend strongly on shape, and the present study developed a method for determining the shape that minimizes bending energy. This was first applied to a fusion pore modeled as a single surface and then extended to a more realistic model treating a bilayer as two monolayers. For the two-monolayer model, fusion pores were found to have metastable states with energy minima at particular values of the pore diameter and bilayer separation. Fusion pore energies were relatively insensitive to membrane thickness but highly sensitive to spontaneous curvature and membrane asymmetry. With symmetrical bilayers and monolayer spontaneous curvatures of −0.1 nm−1 (a typical value) separated by 6 nm (closest distance determined by repulsive hydration forces), fusion pore formation required 43–65 kT. The pore radius of ~2.25 nm fell within the range estimated from conductance measurements. With bilayer separation >6 nm, fusion pore formation required less energy, suggesting that protein scaffolds can promote fusion by bending membranes toward one another. With nonzero spontaneous monolayer curvature, the shape that minimized the energy change during fusion pore formation differed from the shape that minimized its energy after it formed. Thus, a nascent fusion pore will relax spontaneously to a new shape, consistent with the experimentally observed expansion of nascent fusion pores during viral fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 115
页数:14
相关论文
共 116 条
[11]  
Kozlov MM(2003)Curvature and bending constants for phosphatidylserine-containing membranes Biophys J 85 1667-1674
[12]  
Chizmadzhev YA(1998)Tilt model of inverted amphiphilic mesophases Eur Phys J 1 519-528
[13]  
Cohen FS(2000)Elastic energy of tilt and bending of fluid membranes Eur Phys J 3 323-335
[14]  
Shcherbakov A(1973)Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: theory and possible experiments Z Naturforsch [C] 28 693-703
[15]  
Zimmerberg J(2004)Field theoretic study of bilayer membrane fusion. I. Hemifusion mechanism Biophys J 87 3277-3290
[16]  
Chizmadzhev YA(2002)Capacitance steps and fusion pores of small and large-dense-core vesicles in nerve terminals Nature 418 89-92
[17]  
Kuzmin PI(2007)Molecular dynamics simulations of lipid vesicle fusion in atomic detail Biophys J 92 4254-4261
[18]  
Kumenko DA(1998)A mechanism of protein-mediated fusion: coupling between refolding of the influenza hemagglutinin and lipid rearrangements Biophys J 75 1384-1396
[19]  
Zimmerberg J(1989)Stalk mechanism of vesicle fusion. Intermixing of aqueous contents Eur Biophys J 17 121-129
[20]  
Cohen FS(2002)Stalk model of membrane fusion: solution of energy crisis Biophys J 82 882-895