Varieties in state capitalism: Outward FDI strategies of central and local state-owned enterprises from emerging economy countries

被引:0
作者
Ming Hua Li
Lin Cui
Jiangyong Lu
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business School,Department of International Economics and Management
[2] Research School of Management,undefined
[3] The Australian National University,undefined
[4] Guanghua School of Management,undefined
[5] Peking University,undefined
来源
Journal of International Business Studies | 2014年 / 45卷
关键词
state-owned multinationals; institutional reform; firm heterogeneity; internationalization; emerging markets/countries/economies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Institutional diversity characterizing state-owned enterprises (SOEs) from emerging economies holds critical but under-examined implications for their internationalization activities. Different types of SOEs can exhibit distinct motivations, strategic resources, and adaptive capabilities for penetrating foreign markets. To understand how such idiosyncratic differences emerge, we conceptualize the heterogeneity of SOEs as an outcome of multiple institutional reform processes – administrative and fiscal decentralization, industrial restructuring, and market liberalization – which create diversity between SOEs affiliated with central and local levels of government. Building on the idea of “institutions-as-configurations”, we elucidate how such reforms reconfigure SOEs’ constellation of resources, capabilities, and priorities which shape the parameters of their ability to negotiate for home and host country institutional legitimacy. Specifically, we propose that the restructuring of central SOEs into “national champions” exposes them to stronger institutional pressures from home and host country governments while local SOEs which have fewer obligations to serve national strategic prerogatives display greater managerial autonomy and market orientation, but lower levels of monopolistic behavior. We discuss how such contrasting attributes contribute to variations in SOEs’ international business diversification patterns, foreign subsidiary establishment and ownership modes, and overseas location preferences. Recognition of SOEs’ organizational diversity holds important implications for theories on state-owned multinationals.
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 1004
页数:24
相关论文
共 156 条
[1]  
Aoki M(1994)The contingent governance of teams: Analysis of institutional complementarity International Economic Review 35 657-676
[2]  
Aulakh PS(2008)Institutional changes and organizational transformation in developing economies Journal of International Management 14 209-216
[3]  
Kotabe M(1999)The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 411-427
[4]  
Baker WE(2005)Ownership versus environment: Disentangling the sources of public-sector inefficiency The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 135-147
[5]  
Sinkula JM(2002)Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance Journal of International Business Studies 33 203-221
[6]  
Bartel AP(2012)Political institutional change, obsolescing legitimacy, and multinational corporations Management International Review 52 847-877
[7]  
Harrison AE(2006)Local government reform in China: A rational actor perspective International Review of Administrative Sciences 72 253-267
[8]  
Brouthers KD(2006)Institutional innovations, asymmetric decentralization, and local economic development: A case study of Kunshan, in post-Mao China Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25 269-290
[9]  
Bucheli M(2005)The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management Organization Review 1 381-410
[10]  
Kim MY(2001)China’s transition and its implications for international business Journal of International Business Studies 32 5-21