Modeling of SPT Seismic Liquefaction Data Using Minimax Probability Machine

被引：4

作者：

Samui P. ^{[1
]}

Hariharan R. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Centre for Disaster Mitigation and Management, VIT University, Vellore

[2] Department of Computer Science, Annai Mira College of Engineering and Technology, Arapakam, Vellore

来源：

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | 2014年 / 32卷 / 3期

关键词：

Classification; Liquefaction; Minimax Probability Machine; Standard Penetration Test;

D O I：

10.1007/s10706-014-9749-4

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The determination of seismic liquefaction potential of soil is an important task in geotechnical engineering. This article uses Minimax Probability Machine (MPM) for determination of seismic liquefaction potential of soil based on Standard Penetration Test value (N). MPM is developed based on the use of hyperplanes. It is a discriminant classifier. This study uses MPM as a classification tool. MPM uses the database collected from Chi-Chi earthquake. Two models (MODEL I and MODEL II) have been developed. MODEL I uses Cyclic Stress Ratio and N as input variables. Peck Ground Acceleration and N have been adopted as inputs for MODEL II. The performance of MODEL I and MODEL II are 97.67 and 96.51 % respectively. The performance of MODEL II is 94.11 % for the global data. The developed MPM shows good generalization capability. The results show that the developed MPM has ability for determination of seismic liquefaction potential of soil. © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

引用

页码：699 / 703

页数：4

共 26 条

[11]

Pal M., Support vector machines-based modelling of seismic liquefaction potential, Int J Num Anal Methods Geomech, 30, pp. 983-996, (2006)

[12]

Park D., Rilett L.R., Forecasting freeway link ravel times with a multi-layer feed forward neural network, Comput Aid Civil Infrastruct Eng, 14, pp. 358-367, (1999)

[13]

Robertson P.K., Campanella R.G., Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part I: sand, Can Geotech J, 20, 4, pp. 718-733, (1983)

[14]

Samui P., Seismic liquefaction potential assessment by using relevance vector machine, Earthq Eng Eng Vib, 6, 4, pp. 331-336, (2007)

[15]

Samui P., Support vector machine applied to settlement of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils, Comput Goetech, 35, 3, pp. 419-427, (2008)

[16]

Samui P., Least square support vector machine and relevance vector machine for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential using SPT, Nat Hazards, 59, 2, pp. 811-822, (2011)

[17]

Seed H.B., Idriss I.M., Analysis of soil liquefaction: Niigata earthquake, J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE, 93, 3, pp. 83-108, (1967)

[18]

Seed H.B., Idriss I.M., Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential, J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE, 97, 9, pp. 1249-1273, (1971)

[19]

Seed H.B., Idriss I.M., Arango I., Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data, J Geotech Eng Div ASCE, 109, 3, pp. 458-482, (1983)

[20]

Seed H.B., Tokimatsu K., Harder L.F., Chung R.M., Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluation, (1984)

← 1 2 3 →