Aliasing of the Indian Ocean externally-forced warming spatial pattern by internal climate variability

被引:0
作者
S. Gopika
Takeshi Izumo
Jérôme Vialard
Matthieu Lengaigne
Iyyappan Suresh
M. R. Ramesh Kumar
机构
[1] CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography,Physical Oceanography Division
[2] LOCEAN,Indo
[3] IPSL,French Cell for Water Sciences
[4] Sorbonne Universités (UPMC,undefined
[5] Univ. Paris 06)-CNRS-IRD-MNHN,undefined
[6] NIO,undefined
[7] NIO-IISc-IITM–IRD Joint International Laboratory,undefined
来源
Climate Dynamics | 2020年 / 54卷
关键词
Indian Ocean; Anthropogenic climate change; Natural climate variability; Sea surface temperature (SST); Coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP); Spatial pattern of Indian Ocean SST change;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) models project an inhomogeneous anthropogenic surface warming of the Indian Ocean by the end of the 21st century, with strongest warming in the Arabian Sea and Western equatorial Indian Ocean. Previous studies have warned that this “Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD)-like” warming pattern could yield more Arabian Sea cyclones, more extreme IOD events and decrease monsoonal rains. Here we show that CMIP5 models also produce an “IOD-like” pattern over the 1871–2016 period, in broad agreement with observations. Single-models ensemble simulations however indicate a strong aliasing of the warming pattern “signal” by the internal climate variability “noise” over that period. While the average Indian Ocean warming emerges around 1950 in CMIP5 and observations, regional contrasts are more difficult to detect. The only detectable signal by 2016 in CMIP5 is a stronger Arabian Sea than Bay of Bengal warming in > 80% of the models, which is not detected in HadSST3 observations. Conversely, observations already detect a stronger Northern than Southern Indian ocean warming, while this signal only emerges by ~ 2060 in > 80% of the models. Subsampling observations to only retain the most accurate values however indicate that this observed signal most likely results from sampling issues in the Southern hemisphere. In light of this large aliasing by internal climate variability and observational uncertainties, the broad agreement between CMIP5 and observations over 1871–2016 may be largely coincidental. Overall, these results call for extreme caution when interpreting spatial patterns of anthropogenic surface warming.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1111
页数:18
相关论文
共 232 条
  • [1] Alory G(2009)Warming of the upper equatorial Indian Ocean and changes in the heat budget (1960–1999) J Clim 22 93-113
  • [2] Meyers G(2007)Observed temperature trends in the Indian Ocean over 1960–1999 and associated mechanisms Geophys Res Lett 34 L02606-2009
  • [3] Alory G(1999)The effective number of spatial degrees of freedom of a time-varying field J Clim 12 1990-258
  • [4] Wijffels S(2014)Increased frequency of extreme Indian Ocean Dipole events due to greenhouse warming Nature 510 254-143
  • [5] Meyers M(2010)Sea surface temperature variability: patterns and mechanisms Ann Rev Mar Sci 2 115-546
  • [6] Bretherton CS(2012)Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability Clim Dyn 38 527-3362
  • [7] Widmann M(2014)The Indian Ocean Sea surface temperature warming simulated by CMIP5 models during the 20th century: competing forcing roles of GHGs and anthropogenic aerosols J Clim 27 3348-217
  • [8] Dymnikov VP(2014)Indian Ocean warming during 1958–2004 simulated by a climate system model and its mechanism Clim Dyn 42 203-367
  • [9] Wallace JM(2008)Role of atmospheric adjustments in the tropical Indian Ocean warming during the 20th century in climate models Geophys Res Lett 35 L08712-11086
  • [10] Bladé I(1995)Correction of instrumental biases in historical sea surface temperature data Q J R Meteorol Soc 121 319-785