"Going Flat" After Mastectomy: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Online Survey

被引:47
作者
Baker, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Dizon, Don S. [2 ,3 ]
Wenziger, Cachet M. [4 ]
Streja, Elani [4 ]
Thompson, Carlie K. [1 ]
Lee, Minna K. [1 ]
DiNome, Maggie L. [1 ]
Attai, Deanna J. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Lifespan Canc Inst, Providence, RI USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Med, Dept Med, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[5] UCLA Hlth Burbank Breast Care, Burbank, CA 91505 USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; LATERAL DOG EAR; RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER; SATISFACTION; THERAPY; RATES;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-020-09448-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The Going Flat movement aims to increase awareness and acceptance of mastectomy alone as a viable option for patients. Little is known about motivations and satisfaction with surgical outcomes in this population. Methods An online survey was administered to 931 women who had a history of uni- or bilateral mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer or elevated breast cancer risk without current breast mound reconstruction. Satisfaction with outcome and surgeon support for the patient experience were characterized using 5-level scaled scores. Results Mastectomy alone was the first choice for 73.7% of the respondents. The top two reasons for going flat were desire for a faster recovery and avoidance of a foreign body placement. Overall, the mean scaled satisfaction score was 3.72 +/- 1.17 out of 5. In the multivariable analysis, low level of surgeon support for the decision to go flat was the strongest predictor of a satisfaction score lower than 3 (odds ratio [OR], 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-5.72; p < 0.001). Dissatisfaction also was more likely among respondents reporting a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m(2) or higher (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.76-4.27; p < 0.001) and those undergoing a unilateral procedure (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.29-3.09; p = 0.002). Greater satisfaction was associated with receiving adequate information about surgical options (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.69; p < 0.0001) and having a surgeon with a specialized breast surgery practice (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.81; p = 0.002). Conclusions Most patients undergoing mastectomy alone are satisfied with their surgical outcome. Surgeons may optimize patient experience by recognizing and supporting a patient's decision to go flat.
引用
收藏
页码:2493 / 2505
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Use of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Results From a Population-Based Study [J].
Alderman, Amy K. ;
Hawley, Sarah T. ;
Janz, Nancy K. ;
Mujahid, Mahasin S. ;
Morrow, Monica ;
Hamilton, Ann S. ;
Graff, John J. ;
Katz, Steven J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (32) :5325-5330
[2]   A National Snapshot of Satisfaction with Breast Cancer Procedures [J].
Atisha, Dunya M. ;
Rushing, Christel N. ;
Samsa, Gregory P. ;
Locklear, Tracie D. ;
Cox, Charlie E. ;
Hwang, E. Shelley ;
Zenn, Michael R. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Abernethy, Amy P. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) :361-369
[3]   Flat closure after mastectomy: Are your patients satisfied with the results? [J].
Bowles, Kimberly B. .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
[4]   The BREAST-Q: Further Validation in Independent Clinical Samples [J].
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Klassen, Anne F. ;
Scott, Amie M. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (02) :293-302
[5]   Oncoplastic Technique for the Elimination of the Lateral "Dog Ear" During Mastectomy [J].
Clough, Krishna B. ;
Massey, Eleanore J. D. ;
Mahadev, G. K. ;
Kaufman, Gabriel J. ;
Nos, Claude ;
Sarfati, Isabelle .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (06) :588-590
[6]   The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015 [J].
Cohen, Wess A. ;
Mundy, Lily R. ;
Ballard, Tiffany N. S. ;
Klassen, Anne ;
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Browne, John ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2016, 69 (02) :149-162
[7]  
Collins KK, 2011, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V126, P167, DOI 10.1007/s10549-010-1077-7
[8]   US FDA Breast Implant Postapproval Studies Long-term Outcomes in 99,993 Patients [J].
Coroneos, Christopher J. ;
Selber, Jesse C. ;
Offodile, Anaeze C. ;
Butler, Charles E. ;
Clemens, Mark W. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (01) :30-36
[9]   Technical considerations in nonreconstructive mastectomy patients [J].
Djohan, Michelle ;
Knackstedt, Rebecca ;
Leavitt, Tripp ;
Djohan, Risal ;
Grobmyer, Stephen .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (04) :702-704
[10]   Quality-of-Life Outcomes between Mastectomy Alone and Breast Reconstruction: Comparison of Patient-Reported BREAST-Q and Other Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measures [J].
Eltahir, Yassir ;
Werners, Lisanne L. C. H. ;
Dreise, Marieke M. ;
van Emmichoven, Ingeborg A. Zeijlmans ;
Jansen, Liesbeth ;
Werker, Paul M. N. ;
de Bock, Geertruida H. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (02) :201E-209E