Comparison of multiple learning artificial intelligence models for estimation of long-term monthly temperatures in Turkey

被引:43
作者
Citakoglu H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri
关键词
Air temperature; Gaussian process regression; Long short-term memory; Support vector machine regression;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-021-08484-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Performance of four different machine learning–based approaches (long short-term memory (LSTM), support vector machine regression (SVMR), Gaussian process regression (GPR), and multi-gene genetic programming (MGGP) models) in estimation of long-term monthly temperatures was investigated in this study. Data of 250 measuring stations of Turkey were used in present trials. Month numbers of the year, latitude, longitude, and altitude variables were used as input data of the models. Error statistics of mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), and Nash−Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) were used while comparing the four models. In terms of five error statistics, models yielded similar outcomes. Therefore, Taylor and Violin diagrams were used to assess how close the model-estimated values to measured data. Taylor and Violin diagrams revealed that GPR model had better performance in estimation of maximum and average temperatures than the other three models. Also, it was determined that the measured data estimated by the Kruskal–Wallis test came from the same distribution. At the end of this study, efficiency of the methods recommended for comparisons was proven. © 2021, Saudi Society for Geosciences.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [31] Mehdizadeh S., Assessing the potential of data-driven models for estimation of long-term monthly temperatures, Comput Electron Agric, 144, pp. 114-125, (2018)
  • [32] Mehdizadeh S., Behmanesh J., Khalili K., Evaluating the performance of artificial intelligence methods for estimation of monthly mean soil temperature without using meteorological data, Environ Earth Sci, 76, 8, (2017)
  • [33] Mehr A.D., Gandomi A.H., MSGP-LASSO: an improved multi-stage genetic programming model for streamflow prediction, Inf Sci, 561, pp. 181-195, (2021)
  • [34] Mirasgedis S., Sarafidis Y., Georgopoulou E., Lalas D.P., Moschovits M., Karagiannis F., Papakonstantinou D., Models for mid-term electricity demand forecasting incorporating weather influences, Energy, 31, 2-3, pp. 208-227, (2006)
  • [35] Muduli K., Das S.K., CPT-based seismic liquefaction potential evaluation using multi-gene genetic programming approach, Indian Geotecnical J, 1, pp. 86-93, (2013)
  • [36] Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V., River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles, J Hydrol, 10, 3, pp. 282-290, (1970)
  • [37] Nazari A., Rajeev P., Sanjayan J.G., Modelling of upheaval buckling of offshore pipeline buried in clay soil using genetic programming, Eng Struct, 101, pp. 306-317, (2015)
  • [38] Neal R.M., Springer, (1996)
  • [39] Ododo J.C., Prediction of solar radiation using only maximum temperature and relative humidity: South-east and north-east Nigeria, Energy Convers Manag, 38, 18, (1997)
  • [40] Ododo J.C., Sulaiman A.T., Aidan J., Yuguda M.M., Ogbu F.A., The importance of maximum air temperature in the parameterisation of solar radiation in Nigeria, Renew Energy, 6, 7, (1995)