Hybrid finite difference–finite element method to incorporate topography and bathymetry for two-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling

被引:0
作者
Weerachai Sarakorn
Chatchai Vachiratienchai
机构
[1] Khon Kaen University,Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science
[2] Curl-E Geophysics Co. Ltd,undefined
来源
Earth, Planets and Space | / 70卷
关键词
Hybrid method; Finite difference method; Finite element method; 2-D magnetotelluric modeling; 65; 30; 65; 50; 74; 05;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this research, a new numerical method, called the hybrid finite difference–finite element (hybrid FD–FE) method, is developed to solve 2-D magnetotelluric modeling by taking advantage of both the finite difference (FD) and finite element (FE) methods. With the hybrid FD–FE method, the model is first discretized as rectangular blocks and separated into two zones: the FD and FE zones. The FD zone is set for the subregions where topography or bathymetry does not appear. The FD approximation, which is fast, accurate and requires less memory resources, is then applied. For the FE zones where topography or bathymetry exists, the rectangular blocks are transformed into quadrilateral elements to handle the topography or bathymetry appropriately. Then, the FE approximation with quadrilateral elements, which is more accurate for topography or bathymetry zones, is applied. The system of equations for the hybrid FD–FE method is then formed according to the FD and FE schemes. The obtained system is a combination of the FD and FE equations. Three numerical methods are applied to test models with and without topography and bathymetry. The accuracy and efficiency in terms of errors, computational time and memory storage are presented, compared and discussed. The numerical experiments indicate that the FD scheme has a shorter computational time than the other schemes when modeling without topography and retains accuracy equivalent to that of the FE method, whereas FE is more practical when modeling with topography and bathymetry. However, our proposed hybrid FD–FE method is efficient in both situations. Without topography or bathymetry, its efficiency and accuracy approach those of the FD scheme. With topography and bathymetry, the hybrid FD–FE method is as accurate as FE, but its speed is slightly slower than that of FD. In terms of memory storage, the hybrid FD–FE method consumes slightly more storage than the FD method. This hybrid FD–FE method can be further extended and implemented for 3-D magnetotelluric modeling for more efficient computation.[graphic not available: see fulltext]
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Baba K(2005)Correction of seafloor magnetotelluric data for topographic effects during inversion J Geophys Res B Solid Earth 110 1-16
[2]  
Chave AD(2012)Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems Geophys J Int 189 251-267
[3]  
Egbert GD(2008)Incorporating topography into 2D resistivity modeling using finite-element and finite-difference approaches Geophysics 73 F135-F142
[4]  
Kelbert A(2007)Adaptive unstructured grid finite element simulation of two-dimensional magnetotelluric fields for arbitrary surface and seafloor topography Geophys J Int 171 71-86
[5]  
Erdoğan E(2008)A 3-D hybrid finite-difference–finite-element viscoelastic modelling of seismic wave motion Geophys J Int 175 153-184
[6]  
Demirci I(2015)Parallel three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using adaptive finite-element method. Part I: theory and synthetic study Geophys J Int 202 584-603
[7]  
Candansayar ME(2015)Large-scale 3D geoelectromagnetic modeling using parallel adaptive high-order finite element method Geophysics 80 277-291
[8]  
Franke A(2002)Elastic wave modelling in 3D heterogeneous media: 3D grid method Geophys J Int 150 780-799
[9]  
Börner R-U(2006)Adaptive finite-element modeling using unstructured grids: the 2D magnetotelluric example Geophysics 71 G291-G299
[10]  
Spitzer K(2016)3-D magnetotelluric inversion including topography using deformed hexahedral edge finite elements and direct solvers parallelized on SMP computers—part I: forward problem and parameter jacobians Geophys J Int 204 74-93