Interlaboratory Comparative Study to Detect Potentially Infectious Human Enteric Viruses in Influent and Effluent Waters

被引:0
作者
Walter Randazzo
Joaquín Piqueras
Zoran Evtoski
Guadalupe Sastre
Raquel Sancho
Carina Gonzalez
Gloria Sánchez
机构
[1] University of Valencia,Department of Microbiology and Ecology
[2] IATA-CSIC,Department of Preservation and Food Safety Technologies
[3] GAMASER,Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences
[4] University of L’Aquila,undefined
来源
Food and Environmental Virology | 2019年 / 11卷
关键词
Foodborne viruses; Viability RT-qPCR; Sewage; Effluent water;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Wastewater represents the main reusable water source after being adequately sanitized by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). In this sense, only bacterial quality indicators are usually checked to this end, and human pathogenic viruses usually escape from both sanitization procedures and controls, posing a health risk on the use of effluent waters. In this study, we evaluated a protocol based on aluminum adsorption–precipitation to concentrate several human enteric viruses, including norovirus genogroup I (NoV GI), NoV GII, hepatitis A virus (HAV), astrovirus (HAstV), and rotavirus (RV), with limits of detection of 4.08, 4.64, 5.46 log genomic copies (gc)/L, 3.31, and 5.41 log PCR units (PCRU)/L, respectively. Furthermore, the method was applied in two independent laboratories to monitor the presence of NoV GI, NoV GII, and HAV in effluent and influent waters collected from five WWTPs at two different sampling dates. Concomitantly, a viability PMAxx-RT-qPCR was applied to all the samples to get information on the potential infectivity of both influent and effluent waters. The ranges of the titers in influent waters for NoV GI, NoV GII, RV, and HAstV were 4.80–7.56, 5.19–7.31 log gc/L, 5.41–6.52, and 4.59–7.33 log PCRU/L, respectively. In effluent waters, the titers ranged between 4.08 and 6.27, 4.64 and 6.08 log gc/L, < 5.51, and between 3.31 and 5.58 log PCRU/L. Moreover, the viral titers detected by viability RT-qPCR showed statistical differences with RT-qPCR alone, suggesting the potential viral infectivity of the samples despite some observed reductions. The proposed method could be applied in ill-equipped laboratories, due to the lack of a requirement for a specific apparatus (i.e., ultracentrifuge).
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 363
页数:13
相关论文
共 255 条
[1]  
Ashbolt NJ(2015)Microbial contamination of drinking water and human health from community water systems Current Environmental Health Reports 2 95-106
[2]  
Aw TG(2012)Detection of pathogens in water: From phylochips to qPCR to pyrosequencing Current Opinion in Biotechnology 23 422-430
[3]  
Rose JB(2018)Viral tools for detection of fecal contamination and microbial source tracking in wastewater from food industries and domestic sewage Journal of Virological Methods 262 79-88
[4]  
Barrios ME(2015)Wastewater reuse in irrigation: A microbiological perspective on implications in soil fertility and human and environmental health Environment International 75 117-135
[5]  
Blanco Fernández MD(2017)Improved detection of norovirus and hepatitis A virus in surface water by applying pre-PCR processing Food and Environmental Virology 9 395-405
[6]  
Cammarata RV(2017)Bayesian belief network modelling of chlorine disinfection for human pathogenic viruses in municipal wastewater Water Research 109 144-154
[7]  
Torres C(2013)Methods for primary concentration of viruses from water samples: A review and meta-analysis of recent studies Journal of Applied Microbiology 115 1-11
[8]  
Mbayed VA(2013)Discrimination of infectious hepatitis A virus and rotavirus by combining dyes and surfactants with RT-qPCR BMC Microbiology 13 216-214
[9]  
Becerra-Castro C(2016)Detection of human enteric viruses in freshwater from European countries Food and Environmental Virology 8 206-9157
[10]  
Lopes AR(2008)Norovirus removal and particle association in a waste stabilization pond Environmental Science and Technology 42 9151-7897